Take back your fish: questioning NGO-mediated development in Caquetá, Colombia

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Take back your fish : questioning NGO-mediated development in Caquetá, Colombia. / Acosta García, Nicolás; Fold, Niels.

In: Third World Quarterly, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2022, p. 148-165.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Acosta García, N & Fold, N 2022, 'Take back your fish: questioning NGO-mediated development in Caquetá, Colombia', Third World Quarterly, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 148-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.1996225

APA

Acosta García, N., & Fold, N. (2022). Take back your fish: questioning NGO-mediated development in Caquetá, Colombia. Third World Quarterly, 43(1), 148-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.1996225

Vancouver

Acosta García N, Fold N. Take back your fish: questioning NGO-mediated development in Caquetá, Colombia. Third World Quarterly. 2022;43(1):148-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.1996225

Author

Acosta García, Nicolás ; Fold, Niels. / Take back your fish : questioning NGO-mediated development in Caquetá, Colombia. In: Third World Quarterly. 2022 ; Vol. 43, No. 1. pp. 148-165.

Bibtex

@article{f0dcf8755e774f5cb4f816193a13da4f,
title = "Take back your fish: questioning NGO-mediated development in Caquet{\'a}, Colombia",
abstract = "Could aquaculture lift farmers out of poverty and provide stability and an alternative livelihood to coca farming? Currently, aquaculture is pursued on a moderate scale, with the involvement of around 1500 small-scale farmers, in Caquet{\'a}, a department located in the Amazonian bioregion of Colombia. Some 400 farmers are organised in a grassroots non-governmental organisation (NGO) called Acuica. Cultivation and sale of fish provide a means for local fish farmers to move away from coca production and diversify their economic activities beyond cattle ranching and dairy production. In this article, we analyse the relationships among fish farmers, the state and Acuica. We argue that NGO success in securing donor funding can be underpinned by an NGO developmentalist gaze that homogenises its constituencies, which in the case of Acuica obscures different logics of fish production. This not only helps explain the mixed results in achieving development objectives but also suggests that initiatives that are intended to help farmers can imperil those who are already vulnerable. On the other hand, we argue that farmers{\textquoteright} strategic dependency on development initiatives displays their complex agency, as they are active consumers both engaging with and resisting the state{\textquoteright}s NGO-mediated project of development.",
keywords = "aquaculture, development, livelihoods, non-governmental organisation (NGO), strategic dependency",
author = "{Acosta Garc{\'i}a}, Nicol{\'a}s and Niels Fold",
note = "Funding Information: We are grateful to the farmers of Caquet{\'a} and to Acuica{\textquoteright}s personnel for participating in this study. Also, we are grateful to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark for providing the funding for this research. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1080/01436597.2021.1996225",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "148--165",
journal = "Third World Quarterly",
issn = "0143-6597",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Take back your fish

T2 - questioning NGO-mediated development in Caquetá, Colombia

AU - Acosta García, Nicolás

AU - Fold, Niels

N1 - Funding Information: We are grateful to the farmers of Caquetá and to Acuica’s personnel for participating in this study. Also, we are grateful to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark for providing the funding for this research. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Could aquaculture lift farmers out of poverty and provide stability and an alternative livelihood to coca farming? Currently, aquaculture is pursued on a moderate scale, with the involvement of around 1500 small-scale farmers, in Caquetá, a department located in the Amazonian bioregion of Colombia. Some 400 farmers are organised in a grassroots non-governmental organisation (NGO) called Acuica. Cultivation and sale of fish provide a means for local fish farmers to move away from coca production and diversify their economic activities beyond cattle ranching and dairy production. In this article, we analyse the relationships among fish farmers, the state and Acuica. We argue that NGO success in securing donor funding can be underpinned by an NGO developmentalist gaze that homogenises its constituencies, which in the case of Acuica obscures different logics of fish production. This not only helps explain the mixed results in achieving development objectives but also suggests that initiatives that are intended to help farmers can imperil those who are already vulnerable. On the other hand, we argue that farmers’ strategic dependency on development initiatives displays their complex agency, as they are active consumers both engaging with and resisting the state’s NGO-mediated project of development.

AB - Could aquaculture lift farmers out of poverty and provide stability and an alternative livelihood to coca farming? Currently, aquaculture is pursued on a moderate scale, with the involvement of around 1500 small-scale farmers, in Caquetá, a department located in the Amazonian bioregion of Colombia. Some 400 farmers are organised in a grassroots non-governmental organisation (NGO) called Acuica. Cultivation and sale of fish provide a means for local fish farmers to move away from coca production and diversify their economic activities beyond cattle ranching and dairy production. In this article, we analyse the relationships among fish farmers, the state and Acuica. We argue that NGO success in securing donor funding can be underpinned by an NGO developmentalist gaze that homogenises its constituencies, which in the case of Acuica obscures different logics of fish production. This not only helps explain the mixed results in achieving development objectives but also suggests that initiatives that are intended to help farmers can imperil those who are already vulnerable. On the other hand, we argue that farmers’ strategic dependency on development initiatives displays their complex agency, as they are active consumers both engaging with and resisting the state’s NGO-mediated project of development.

KW - aquaculture

KW - development

KW - livelihoods

KW - non-governmental organisation (NGO)

KW - strategic dependency

U2 - 10.1080/01436597.2021.1996225

DO - 10.1080/01436597.2021.1996225

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85119048423

VL - 43

SP - 148

EP - 165

JO - Third World Quarterly

JF - Third World Quarterly

SN - 0143-6597

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 285248473