Differentiating between inherited and autocrystic zircon in granitoids

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

  • Fulltext

    Accepteret manuskript, 8,37 MB, PDF-dokument

  • Hugo K H Olierook
  • Christopher L Kirkland
  • Szilas, Kristoffer
  • Julie A Hollis
  • Nicholas J Gardiner
  • Agnete Steenfelt
  • Qiang Jiang
  • Chris Yakymchuk
  • Noreen J Evans
  • Bradley J McDonald
Inherited zircon, crystals that did not form in situ from their host magma but were incorporated from either the source region or assimilated from the wall-rock, is common but can be difficult to identify. Age, chemical and/or textural dissimilarity to the youngest zircon fraction are the primary mechanisms of distinguishing such grains. However, in Zr-undersaturated magmas, the entire zircon population may be inherited and, if not identifiable via textural constraints, can lead to erroneous interpretation of magmatic crystallization age and magma source. Here, we present detailed field mapping of cross-cutting relationships, whole-rock geochemistry and zircon textural, U-Pb and trace element data of trondhjemite, granodiorite and granite from two localities in a complex Archean gneiss terrane in southwest Greenland, which reveal cryptic zircon inheritance. Zircon textural, U–Pb and trace element data demonstrate that, in both localities, trondhjemite is the oldest rock (3011 ± 5 Ma, 2σ), which is intruded by granodiorite (2978 ± 4 Ma, 2σ). However, granite intrusions, constrained by cross-cutting relationships as the youngest component, only contain inherited zircon derived from trondhjemite and granodiorite based on ages and trace element concentrations. Without age constraints on the older two lithologies, it would be tempting to consider the youngest zircon fraction as recording crystallization of the granite but this would be erroneous. Furthermore, whole-rock geochemistry indicates that the granite contains only 6 µg g-1 Zr, extremely low for a granitoid with ∼77 wt. %. Such low Zr concentration explains the lack of autocrystic zircon in the granite. We expand on a differentiation tool that uses Th/U ratios in zircon versus that in the whole rock to aid in the identification of inherited zircon. This work emphasizes the need for field observations, geochemistry, grain characterization, and precise geochronology to accurately determine igneous crystallization ages and differentiate between inherited and autocrystic zircon.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Petrology
Vol/bind61
Udgave nummer8
Antal sider26
ISSN0022-3530
DOI
StatusUdgivet - aug. 2020

Antal downloads er baseret på statistik fra Google Scholar og www.ku.dk


Ingen data tilgængelig

ID: 246668388