Network analysis of survey data to identify non-homogeneous teacher self-efficacy development in using formative assessment strategies

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Network analysis of survey data to identify non-homogeneous teacher self-efficacy development in using formative assessment strategies. / Bruun, Jesper; Evans, Robert Harry.

I: Education Sciences, Bind 10, Nr. 3, 2020, s. 1-21.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Bruun, J & Evans, RH 2020, 'Network analysis of survey data to identify non-homogeneous teacher self-efficacy development in using formative assessment strategies', Education Sciences, bind 10, nr. 3, s. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10030054

APA

Bruun, J., & Evans, R. H. (2020). Network analysis of survey data to identify non-homogeneous teacher self-efficacy development in using formative assessment strategies. Education Sciences, 10(3), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10030054

Vancouver

Bruun J, Evans RH. Network analysis of survey data to identify non-homogeneous teacher self-efficacy development in using formative assessment strategies. Education Sciences. 2020;10(3):1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10030054

Author

Bruun, Jesper ; Evans, Robert Harry. / Network analysis of survey data to identify non-homogeneous teacher self-efficacy development in using formative assessment strategies. I: Education Sciences. 2020 ; Bind 10, Nr. 3. s. 1-21.

Bibtex

@article{8a3a05d15fa64f7db3d3f00022493a1d,
title = "Network analysis of survey data to identify non-homogeneous teacher self-efficacy development in using formative assessment strategies",
abstract = "Data set and analyses can be found here: https://github.com/jbruun/SEsimilarityIn a European project about formative assessment, Local Working Groups (LWGs) from six participating countries made use of a format for teacher-researcher collaboration. The activities in each LWG involved discussions and reflections about implementation of four assessment formats. A key aim was close collaboration between teachers and researchers to develop teachers{\textquoteright} formative assessment practices, which were partially evidenced with changes in attributes of self-efficacy. The research question was: to what extent do working with formative assessment strategies in collaboration with researchers and other teachers differentially affect individual self-efficacy beliefs of practicing teachers across different educational contexts? A 12-item teacher questionnaire, with items selected from a commonly used international instrument for science teaching self-efficacy, was distributed to the participating teachers before and after their work in the LWGs. A novel method of analysis using networks where participants from different LWGs were linked based on the similarities of their answers, revealed differences between empirically identified groups and larger super groups of participants. These analyses showed, for example, that one group of teachers perceived themselves to have knowledge about using formative assessment but did not have the skills to use it effectively. It is suggested that future research and development projects may use this new methodology to pinpoint groups, which seem to respond differently to interventions and modify guidance or instruction accordingly.",
keywords = "Faculty of Science, Network Analysis, Self-efficacy, Teacher Education, formative assessment",
author = "Jesper Bruun and Evans, {Robert Harry}",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.3390/educsci10030054",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "1--21",
journal = "Education Sciences",
issn = "2227-7102",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Network analysis of survey data to identify non-homogeneous teacher self-efficacy development in using formative assessment strategies

AU - Bruun, Jesper

AU - Evans, Robert Harry

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Data set and analyses can be found here: https://github.com/jbruun/SEsimilarityIn a European project about formative assessment, Local Working Groups (LWGs) from six participating countries made use of a format for teacher-researcher collaboration. The activities in each LWG involved discussions and reflections about implementation of four assessment formats. A key aim was close collaboration between teachers and researchers to develop teachers’ formative assessment practices, which were partially evidenced with changes in attributes of self-efficacy. The research question was: to what extent do working with formative assessment strategies in collaboration with researchers and other teachers differentially affect individual self-efficacy beliefs of practicing teachers across different educational contexts? A 12-item teacher questionnaire, with items selected from a commonly used international instrument for science teaching self-efficacy, was distributed to the participating teachers before and after their work in the LWGs. A novel method of analysis using networks where participants from different LWGs were linked based on the similarities of their answers, revealed differences between empirically identified groups and larger super groups of participants. These analyses showed, for example, that one group of teachers perceived themselves to have knowledge about using formative assessment but did not have the skills to use it effectively. It is suggested that future research and development projects may use this new methodology to pinpoint groups, which seem to respond differently to interventions and modify guidance or instruction accordingly.

AB - Data set and analyses can be found here: https://github.com/jbruun/SEsimilarityIn a European project about formative assessment, Local Working Groups (LWGs) from six participating countries made use of a format for teacher-researcher collaboration. The activities in each LWG involved discussions and reflections about implementation of four assessment formats. A key aim was close collaboration between teachers and researchers to develop teachers’ formative assessment practices, which were partially evidenced with changes in attributes of self-efficacy. The research question was: to what extent do working with formative assessment strategies in collaboration with researchers and other teachers differentially affect individual self-efficacy beliefs of practicing teachers across different educational contexts? A 12-item teacher questionnaire, with items selected from a commonly used international instrument for science teaching self-efficacy, was distributed to the participating teachers before and after their work in the LWGs. A novel method of analysis using networks where participants from different LWGs were linked based on the similarities of their answers, revealed differences between empirically identified groups and larger super groups of participants. These analyses showed, for example, that one group of teachers perceived themselves to have knowledge about using formative assessment but did not have the skills to use it effectively. It is suggested that future research and development projects may use this new methodology to pinpoint groups, which seem to respond differently to interventions and modify guidance or instruction accordingly.

KW - Faculty of Science

KW - Network Analysis

KW - Self-efficacy

KW - Teacher Education

KW - formative assessment

UR - https://github.com/jbruun/SEsimilarity

U2 - 10.3390/educsci10030054

DO - 10.3390/educsci10030054

M3 - Journal article

VL - 10

SP - 1

EP - 21

JO - Education Sciences

JF - Education Sciences

SN - 2227-7102

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 236713556