Temporary Urban Projects: Proposing a Multi-Positional Framework for Critical Discussion
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Temporary Urban Projects : Proposing a Multi-Positional Framework for Critical Discussion. / Skytt-Larsen, Christine Benna; Busck, Anne Gravsholt; Lamm, Bettina; Wagner, Anne Margrethe.
I: Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, Bind 4, 722665, 2022.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Temporary Urban Projects
T2 - Proposing a Multi-Positional Framework for Critical Discussion
AU - Skytt-Larsen, Christine Benna
AU - Busck, Anne Gravsholt
AU - Lamm, Bettina
AU - Wagner, Anne Margrethe
N1 - Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2022 Skytt-Larsen, Busck, Lamm and Wagner.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - The aim of this article is to create fertile ground for critical discussion of the discursive field of temporary urban projects (TUPs), their multiple positionings and governance potential in urban and metropolitan development. TUPs constitute short-lived or temporally restricted spatial interventions and social activities in otherwise vacant urban settings. Often made from cheap materials and simple construction methods, TUPs activate urban spaces in transition. Through spatial appropriations, TUPs can explore new uses and potentials in these transforming urban areas. Despite aesthetic and spatial similarities, the discursive field of TUPs is diverse and covers a plethora of uses and understandings of space, actors, activities, intentions and strategies. A critical discussion that recognizes the multiple positionings of the discursive field of TUPs can deepen and nuance our understanding of the governance potential of TUPs contributing to metropolitan urban development. Because of the diversity in actors, strategies and impacts of TUPs and thus, variations in rationales and positions, we suggest that the phenomenon of TUPs to be perceived as a new urban genre that can be approached from several interrelated perspectives reflecting a diverse discursive field with multiple positionings: (1) a spatial-architectural perspective; (2) an urban-economic perspective; (3) a socio-cultural perspective; (4) a local-social perspective; and (5) a political-planning perspective. This multifaceted and critical approach mirrors the different discursive positionings, initiating rationales, and accompanying practices of TUPs and helps us comprehend and critically discuss the governance perspectives that TUPs bring into the design and planning of urban and metropolitan regions.
AB - The aim of this article is to create fertile ground for critical discussion of the discursive field of temporary urban projects (TUPs), their multiple positionings and governance potential in urban and metropolitan development. TUPs constitute short-lived or temporally restricted spatial interventions and social activities in otherwise vacant urban settings. Often made from cheap materials and simple construction methods, TUPs activate urban spaces in transition. Through spatial appropriations, TUPs can explore new uses and potentials in these transforming urban areas. Despite aesthetic and spatial similarities, the discursive field of TUPs is diverse and covers a plethora of uses and understandings of space, actors, activities, intentions and strategies. A critical discussion that recognizes the multiple positionings of the discursive field of TUPs can deepen and nuance our understanding of the governance potential of TUPs contributing to metropolitan urban development. Because of the diversity in actors, strategies and impacts of TUPs and thus, variations in rationales and positions, we suggest that the phenomenon of TUPs to be perceived as a new urban genre that can be approached from several interrelated perspectives reflecting a diverse discursive field with multiple positionings: (1) a spatial-architectural perspective; (2) an urban-economic perspective; (3) a socio-cultural perspective; (4) a local-social perspective; and (5) a political-planning perspective. This multifaceted and critical approach mirrors the different discursive positionings, initiating rationales, and accompanying practices of TUPs and helps us comprehend and critically discuss the governance perspectives that TUPs bring into the design and planning of urban and metropolitan regions.
KW - critical assessment
KW - governance
KW - temporary urban projects
KW - urban actors
KW - urban space
U2 - 10.3389/frsc.2022.722665
DO - 10.3389/frsc.2022.722665
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85128428803
VL - 4
JO - Frontiers in Sustainable Cities
JF - Frontiers in Sustainable Cities
SN - 2624-9634
M1 - 722665
ER -
ID: 305119233