On the problems of using linear models in ecological manipulation experiments: lessons learned from a climate experiment

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Standard

On the problems of using linear models in ecological manipulation experiments : lessons learned from a climate experiment. / Damgaard, Christian; Holmstrup, Martin; Schmidt, Inger Kappel; Beier, Claus; Larsen, Klaus Steenberg.

I: Ecosphere, Bind 9, Nr. 6, e02322, 01.06.2018.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Damgaard, C, Holmstrup, M, Schmidt, IK, Beier, C & Larsen, KS 2018, 'On the problems of using linear models in ecological manipulation experiments: lessons learned from a climate experiment', Ecosphere, bind 9, nr. 6, e02322. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2322

APA

Damgaard, C., Holmstrup, M., Schmidt, I. K., Beier, C., & Larsen, K. S. (2018). On the problems of using linear models in ecological manipulation experiments: lessons learned from a climate experiment. Ecosphere, 9(6), [e02322]. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2322

Vancouver

Damgaard C, Holmstrup M, Schmidt IK, Beier C, Larsen KS. On the problems of using linear models in ecological manipulation experiments: lessons learned from a climate experiment. Ecosphere. 2018 jun. 1;9(6). e02322. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2322

Author

Damgaard, Christian ; Holmstrup, Martin ; Schmidt, Inger Kappel ; Beier, Claus ; Larsen, Klaus Steenberg. / On the problems of using linear models in ecological manipulation experiments : lessons learned from a climate experiment. I: Ecosphere. 2018 ; Bind 9, Nr. 6.

Bibtex

@article{fcb56cbb59574b3d9e6c40e40a25c714,
title = "On the problems of using linear models in ecological manipulation experiments: lessons learned from a climate experiment",
abstract = "Manipulation experiments are often used to investigate ecological and environmental causal relationships and to understand and forecast impacts of anthropogenic pressures on ecosystem functioning. Such manipulation experiments often use factorial designs, and the data are analyzed using factorial linear models. Factorial designs build on the fundamental assumption that the treatment factors are independent and orthogonal. This assumption is, however, often violated because of variation within and in particular covariation between the performed experimental manipulations. For example, manipulation of temperature and precipitation in factorial setups has been widely applied in climate experiments, but manipulating soil temperature will likely have a strong impact on soil water content. Such dependency among environmental state variables will violate the assumed orthogonality in a factorial linear model and may lead to erroneous conclusions. Here, we demonstrate the importance of the assumption of orthogonality using simulated ecological responses that act on observed soil state variables from a large climate experiment with an apparent orthogonal design. More specifically, we explore the problematic consequences of analyzing ecological treatments as categorical variables in a linear model. Suitable alternative methods for the statistical analysis of manipulated ecological experiments are suggested. The key recommendation is to use the observed effects of the manipulations on the state variables directly in the analysis instead of the categories of treatments. For example, if soil water content and temperature are manipulated, then it is essential to measure the water content and temperature in the soil of all the manipulated plots.",
keywords = "climate change experiments, ecology, linear models, manipulative experiments, orthogonal experimental design, soil temperature, soil water",
author = "Christian Damgaard and Martin Holmstrup and Schmidt, {Inger Kappel} and Claus Beier and Larsen, {Klaus Steenberg}",
year = "2018",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ecs2.2322",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "Ecosphere (Washington, D.C.)",
issn = "2150-8925",
publisher = "ecological society of america",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the problems of using linear models in ecological manipulation experiments

T2 - lessons learned from a climate experiment

AU - Damgaard, Christian

AU - Holmstrup, Martin

AU - Schmidt, Inger Kappel

AU - Beier, Claus

AU - Larsen, Klaus Steenberg

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Manipulation experiments are often used to investigate ecological and environmental causal relationships and to understand and forecast impacts of anthropogenic pressures on ecosystem functioning. Such manipulation experiments often use factorial designs, and the data are analyzed using factorial linear models. Factorial designs build on the fundamental assumption that the treatment factors are independent and orthogonal. This assumption is, however, often violated because of variation within and in particular covariation between the performed experimental manipulations. For example, manipulation of temperature and precipitation in factorial setups has been widely applied in climate experiments, but manipulating soil temperature will likely have a strong impact on soil water content. Such dependency among environmental state variables will violate the assumed orthogonality in a factorial linear model and may lead to erroneous conclusions. Here, we demonstrate the importance of the assumption of orthogonality using simulated ecological responses that act on observed soil state variables from a large climate experiment with an apparent orthogonal design. More specifically, we explore the problematic consequences of analyzing ecological treatments as categorical variables in a linear model. Suitable alternative methods for the statistical analysis of manipulated ecological experiments are suggested. The key recommendation is to use the observed effects of the manipulations on the state variables directly in the analysis instead of the categories of treatments. For example, if soil water content and temperature are manipulated, then it is essential to measure the water content and temperature in the soil of all the manipulated plots.

AB - Manipulation experiments are often used to investigate ecological and environmental causal relationships and to understand and forecast impacts of anthropogenic pressures on ecosystem functioning. Such manipulation experiments often use factorial designs, and the data are analyzed using factorial linear models. Factorial designs build on the fundamental assumption that the treatment factors are independent and orthogonal. This assumption is, however, often violated because of variation within and in particular covariation between the performed experimental manipulations. For example, manipulation of temperature and precipitation in factorial setups has been widely applied in climate experiments, but manipulating soil temperature will likely have a strong impact on soil water content. Such dependency among environmental state variables will violate the assumed orthogonality in a factorial linear model and may lead to erroneous conclusions. Here, we demonstrate the importance of the assumption of orthogonality using simulated ecological responses that act on observed soil state variables from a large climate experiment with an apparent orthogonal design. More specifically, we explore the problematic consequences of analyzing ecological treatments as categorical variables in a linear model. Suitable alternative methods for the statistical analysis of manipulated ecological experiments are suggested. The key recommendation is to use the observed effects of the manipulations on the state variables directly in the analysis instead of the categories of treatments. For example, if soil water content and temperature are manipulated, then it is essential to measure the water content and temperature in the soil of all the manipulated plots.

KW - climate change experiments

KW - ecology

KW - linear models

KW - manipulative experiments

KW - orthogonal experimental design

KW - soil temperature

KW - soil water

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050653029&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ecs2.2322

DO - 10.1002/ecs2.2322

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85050653029

VL - 9

JO - Ecosphere (Washington, D.C.)

JF - Ecosphere (Washington, D.C.)

SN - 2150-8925

IS - 6

M1 - e02322

ER -

ID: 200675426