Stakeholder and expert-guided scenarios for agriculture and landscape development in a groundwater protection area

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Stakeholder and expert-guided scenarios for agriculture and landscape development in a groundwater protection area. / Vejre, Henrik; Vesterager, Jens Peter; Kristensen, Lone S.; Primdahl, Jorgen.

I: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Bind 54, Nr. 9, 01.11.2011, s. 1169-1187.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Vejre, H, Vesterager, JP, Kristensen, LS & Primdahl, J 2011, 'Stakeholder and expert-guided scenarios for agriculture and landscape development in a groundwater protection area', Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, bind 54, nr. 9, s. 1169-1187. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2011.560782

APA

Vejre, H., Vesterager, J. P., Kristensen, L. S., & Primdahl, J. (2011). Stakeholder and expert-guided scenarios for agriculture and landscape development in a groundwater protection area. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54(9), 1169-1187. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2011.560782

Vancouver

Vejre H, Vesterager JP, Kristensen LS, Primdahl J. Stakeholder and expert-guided scenarios for agriculture and landscape development in a groundwater protection area. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 2011 nov. 1;54(9):1169-1187. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2011.560782

Author

Vejre, Henrik ; Vesterager, Jens Peter ; Kristensen, Lone S. ; Primdahl, Jorgen. / Stakeholder and expert-guided scenarios for agriculture and landscape development in a groundwater protection area. I: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 2011 ; Bind 54, Nr. 9. s. 1169-1187.

Bibtex

@article{2ef4f9ab353c46e88f400805a861fe0d,
title = "Stakeholder and expert-guided scenarios for agriculture and landscape development in a groundwater protection area",
abstract = "Nitrate and pesticide leaching led to the designation of groundwater protection zones in Denmark. The protective measures in these zones often clash with local interests in agriculture. Scenarios were used to evaluate the development of a groundwater protection zone in a farming area. Stakeholders are accorded strong influence on the scenarios. Scenario inputs comprised land cover, land use and farmers' plans and preferences, as registered in interviews with farmers. Scenarios were evaluated regarding the effect on nitrate leaching, extent of pesticide-free area and farm income. The scenarios proved effective in modelling coupled development in land use/land cover and nitrate leaching and pesticide-free area. Voluntary commitment to schemes, calculated according to stakeholder preferences, reduced nitrate leaching by up to 15%. Scenarios with additional inputs from experts who formulated more comprehensive landscape projects reduced the present loss by up to 30%. In both cases, the pesticide free areas were doubled. In general, the bottom-up approaches had a lesser effect on reducing nitrogen losses than did the top-down approaches.",
keywords = "Groundwater, Land use, Landscape scenario, Nitrogen leaching, Stakeholder interview",
author = "Henrik Vejre and Vesterager, {Jens Peter} and Kristensen, {Lone S.} and Jorgen Primdahl",
year = "2011",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09640568.2011.560782",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "1169--1187",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Planning and Management",
issn = "0964-0568",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stakeholder and expert-guided scenarios for agriculture and landscape development in a groundwater protection area

AU - Vejre, Henrik

AU - Vesterager, Jens Peter

AU - Kristensen, Lone S.

AU - Primdahl, Jorgen

PY - 2011/11/1

Y1 - 2011/11/1

N2 - Nitrate and pesticide leaching led to the designation of groundwater protection zones in Denmark. The protective measures in these zones often clash with local interests in agriculture. Scenarios were used to evaluate the development of a groundwater protection zone in a farming area. Stakeholders are accorded strong influence on the scenarios. Scenario inputs comprised land cover, land use and farmers' plans and preferences, as registered in interviews with farmers. Scenarios were evaluated regarding the effect on nitrate leaching, extent of pesticide-free area and farm income. The scenarios proved effective in modelling coupled development in land use/land cover and nitrate leaching and pesticide-free area. Voluntary commitment to schemes, calculated according to stakeholder preferences, reduced nitrate leaching by up to 15%. Scenarios with additional inputs from experts who formulated more comprehensive landscape projects reduced the present loss by up to 30%. In both cases, the pesticide free areas were doubled. In general, the bottom-up approaches had a lesser effect on reducing nitrogen losses than did the top-down approaches.

AB - Nitrate and pesticide leaching led to the designation of groundwater protection zones in Denmark. The protective measures in these zones often clash with local interests in agriculture. Scenarios were used to evaluate the development of a groundwater protection zone in a farming area. Stakeholders are accorded strong influence on the scenarios. Scenario inputs comprised land cover, land use and farmers' plans and preferences, as registered in interviews with farmers. Scenarios were evaluated regarding the effect on nitrate leaching, extent of pesticide-free area and farm income. The scenarios proved effective in modelling coupled development in land use/land cover and nitrate leaching and pesticide-free area. Voluntary commitment to schemes, calculated according to stakeholder preferences, reduced nitrate leaching by up to 15%. Scenarios with additional inputs from experts who formulated more comprehensive landscape projects reduced the present loss by up to 30%. In both cases, the pesticide free areas were doubled. In general, the bottom-up approaches had a lesser effect on reducing nitrogen losses than did the top-down approaches.

KW - Groundwater

KW - Land use

KW - Landscape scenario

KW - Nitrogen leaching

KW - Stakeholder interview

U2 - 10.1080/09640568.2011.560782

DO - 10.1080/09640568.2011.560782

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:80053270770

VL - 54

SP - 1169

EP - 1187

JO - Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

JF - Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

SN - 0964-0568

IS - 9

ER -

ID: 130149816