New Multifunctional Hunting Landscapes in Denmark

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

New Multifunctional Hunting Landscapes in Denmark. / Christensen, Andreas Aagaard; Svenningsen, Stig Roar; Lommer, Maria Sofie; Brandt, Jesper.

I: Danish Journal of Geography, Bind 114, Nr. 1, 02.2014, s. 25-40.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Christensen, AA, Svenningsen, SR, Lommer, MS & Brandt, J 2014, 'New Multifunctional Hunting Landscapes in Denmark', Danish Journal of Geography, bind 114, nr. 1, s. 25-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167223.2013.879762

APA

Christensen, A. A., Svenningsen, S. R., Lommer, M. S., & Brandt, J. (2014). New Multifunctional Hunting Landscapes in Denmark. Danish Journal of Geography, 114(1), 25-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167223.2013.879762

Vancouver

Christensen AA, Svenningsen SR, Lommer MS, Brandt J. New Multifunctional Hunting Landscapes in Denmark. Danish Journal of Geography. 2014 feb.;114(1):25-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167223.2013.879762

Author

Christensen, Andreas Aagaard ; Svenningsen, Stig Roar ; Lommer, Maria Sofie ; Brandt, Jesper. / New Multifunctional Hunting Landscapes in Denmark. I: Danish Journal of Geography. 2014 ; Bind 114, Nr. 1. s. 25-40.

Bibtex

@article{7e82573f43c54a609d7cb91879113de1,
title = "New Multifunctional Hunting Landscapes in Denmark",
abstract = "Between 1992 and 2008 subsidization of mandatory set aside land under the EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) gave rise to the establishment of a characteristic type of multifunctional hunting landscapes in Denmark, primarily located on fallow land in tilled valley bottoms. A national survey of these landscapes in 2006 has been carried out and 1061 hunting areas have been identified nationwide. Subsidies relating to set aside land acted as a supplementary type of income, which supported the development of multifunctional land use on marginal soils where the income from hunting and subsidies in combination was a viable alternative to monofunctional rotational agriculture. Hunting landscapes developed as the consequence of landscape management strategies designed to comply with the requirements of the CAP while improving habitat conditions for wildlife and increasing income from hunting rental activities. Forty-seven percent of the hunting landscapes in 2006 were in rotational production in 2010 while 19% were used for other agricultural purposes and 34% were taken out of the subsidy regime and removed from the general agricultural register. In 2012, a total of 431 such areas ‒ 41% of the areas identified in 2006 ‒ were still used for hunting. The number and geographical distribution of the hunting landscapes seems closely related to the potential average hunting rent, the level of urbanisation and the occurrence of manorial estates with traditions for multifunctional land use as part of their economic strategy. Implications for the ongoing discussion on land use policy concerning land sharing vs. land sparing is discussed.",
author = "Christensen, {Andreas Aagaard} and Svenningsen, {Stig Roar} and Lommer, {Maria Sofie} and Jesper Brandt",
year = "2014",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1080/00167223.2013.879762",
language = "English",
volume = "114",
pages = "25--40",
journal = "Geografisk Tidsskrift",
issn = "0016-7223",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - New Multifunctional Hunting Landscapes in Denmark

AU - Christensen, Andreas Aagaard

AU - Svenningsen, Stig Roar

AU - Lommer, Maria Sofie

AU - Brandt, Jesper

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - Between 1992 and 2008 subsidization of mandatory set aside land under the EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) gave rise to the establishment of a characteristic type of multifunctional hunting landscapes in Denmark, primarily located on fallow land in tilled valley bottoms. A national survey of these landscapes in 2006 has been carried out and 1061 hunting areas have been identified nationwide. Subsidies relating to set aside land acted as a supplementary type of income, which supported the development of multifunctional land use on marginal soils where the income from hunting and subsidies in combination was a viable alternative to monofunctional rotational agriculture. Hunting landscapes developed as the consequence of landscape management strategies designed to comply with the requirements of the CAP while improving habitat conditions for wildlife and increasing income from hunting rental activities. Forty-seven percent of the hunting landscapes in 2006 were in rotational production in 2010 while 19% were used for other agricultural purposes and 34% were taken out of the subsidy regime and removed from the general agricultural register. In 2012, a total of 431 such areas ‒ 41% of the areas identified in 2006 ‒ were still used for hunting. The number and geographical distribution of the hunting landscapes seems closely related to the potential average hunting rent, the level of urbanisation and the occurrence of manorial estates with traditions for multifunctional land use as part of their economic strategy. Implications for the ongoing discussion on land use policy concerning land sharing vs. land sparing is discussed.

AB - Between 1992 and 2008 subsidization of mandatory set aside land under the EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) gave rise to the establishment of a characteristic type of multifunctional hunting landscapes in Denmark, primarily located on fallow land in tilled valley bottoms. A national survey of these landscapes in 2006 has been carried out and 1061 hunting areas have been identified nationwide. Subsidies relating to set aside land acted as a supplementary type of income, which supported the development of multifunctional land use on marginal soils where the income from hunting and subsidies in combination was a viable alternative to monofunctional rotational agriculture. Hunting landscapes developed as the consequence of landscape management strategies designed to comply with the requirements of the CAP while improving habitat conditions for wildlife and increasing income from hunting rental activities. Forty-seven percent of the hunting landscapes in 2006 were in rotational production in 2010 while 19% were used for other agricultural purposes and 34% were taken out of the subsidy regime and removed from the general agricultural register. In 2012, a total of 431 such areas ‒ 41% of the areas identified in 2006 ‒ were still used for hunting. The number and geographical distribution of the hunting landscapes seems closely related to the potential average hunting rent, the level of urbanisation and the occurrence of manorial estates with traditions for multifunctional land use as part of their economic strategy. Implications for the ongoing discussion on land use policy concerning land sharing vs. land sparing is discussed.

U2 - 10.1080/00167223.2013.879762

DO - 10.1080/00167223.2013.879762

M3 - Journal article

VL - 114

SP - 25

EP - 40

JO - Geografisk Tidsskrift

JF - Geografisk Tidsskrift

SN - 0016-7223

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 70939345