Rewilding complex ecosystems

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  • Andrea Perino
  • Henrique M. Pereira
  • Laetitia M. Navarro
  • Néstor Fernández
  • James M. Bullock
  • Silvia Ceaușu
  • Ainara Cortés-Avizanda
  • Roel van Klink
  • Tobias Kuemmerle
  • Angela Lomba
  • Guy Pe’er
  • Tobias Plieninger
  • José M. Rey Benayas
  • Christopher J. Sandom
  • Jens-Christian Svenning
  • Helen C. Wheeler

The practice of rewilding has been both promoted and criticized in recent years. Benefits include flexibility to react to environmental change and the promotion of opportunities for society to reconnect with nature. Criticisms include the lack of a clear conceptualization of rewilding, insufficient knowledge about possible outcomes, and the perception that rewilding excludes people from landscapes. Here, we present a framework for rewilding that addresses these concerns. We suggest that rewilding efforts should target trophic complexity, natural disturbances, and dispersal as interacting processes that can improve ecosystem resilience and maintain biodiversity. We propose a structured approach to rewilding projects that includes assessment of the contributions of nature to people and the social-ecological constraints on restoration.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbereaav5570
JournalScience
Volume364
Issue number6438
Number of pages10
ISSN0036-8075
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

ID: 218649490