Myth versus reality: Do parabolic sorption isotherm models reflect actual wood–water thermodynamics?

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Myth versus reality : Do parabolic sorption isotherm models reflect actual wood–water thermodynamics? / Zelinka, Samuel L.; Glass, Samuel V.; Thybring, Emil Engelund.

I: Wood Science and Technology, Bind 52, Nr. 6, 2018, s. 1701-1706.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Zelinka, SL, Glass, SV & Thybring, EE 2018, 'Myth versus reality: Do parabolic sorption isotherm models reflect actual wood–water thermodynamics?', Wood Science and Technology, bind 52, nr. 6, s. 1701-1706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-018-1035-9

APA

Zelinka, S. L., Glass, S. V., & Thybring, E. E. (2018). Myth versus reality: Do parabolic sorption isotherm models reflect actual wood–water thermodynamics? Wood Science and Technology, 52(6), 1701-1706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-018-1035-9

Vancouver

Zelinka SL, Glass SV, Thybring EE. Myth versus reality: Do parabolic sorption isotherm models reflect actual wood–water thermodynamics? Wood Science and Technology. 2018;52(6):1701-1706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-018-1035-9

Author

Zelinka, Samuel L. ; Glass, Samuel V. ; Thybring, Emil Engelund. / Myth versus reality : Do parabolic sorption isotherm models reflect actual wood–water thermodynamics?. I: Wood Science and Technology. 2018 ; Bind 52, Nr. 6. s. 1701-1706.

Bibtex

@article{644cbbe7d54e42b3a8f7e7c9f7d4fce4,
title = "Myth versus reality: Do parabolic sorption isotherm models reflect actual wood–water thermodynamics?",
abstract = "It has been known for over 35 years that commonly used sorption isotherm models fail to correctly predict wood–water properties such as heat of sorption. Despite this, their use to determine thermodynamic quantities and monolayer moisture contents persists and in fact is increasing in frequency. In this paper, we recommend the use of the “ABC isotherm,” which is mathematically equivalent to sorption isotherm models commonly used for wood but has the added benefits of simplicity, avoidance of a conceptual image of water sorption that is contradicted by measurements, and avoidance of any additional step of identifying quantities that are physically incorrect.",
author = "Zelinka, {Samuel L.} and Glass, {Samuel V.} and Thybring, {Emil Engelund}",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1007/s00226-018-1035-9",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "1701--1706",
journal = "Wood Science and Technology",
issn = "0043-7719",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Myth versus reality

T2 - Do parabolic sorption isotherm models reflect actual wood–water thermodynamics?

AU - Zelinka, Samuel L.

AU - Glass, Samuel V.

AU - Thybring, Emil Engelund

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - It has been known for over 35 years that commonly used sorption isotherm models fail to correctly predict wood–water properties such as heat of sorption. Despite this, their use to determine thermodynamic quantities and monolayer moisture contents persists and in fact is increasing in frequency. In this paper, we recommend the use of the “ABC isotherm,” which is mathematically equivalent to sorption isotherm models commonly used for wood but has the added benefits of simplicity, avoidance of a conceptual image of water sorption that is contradicted by measurements, and avoidance of any additional step of identifying quantities that are physically incorrect.

AB - It has been known for over 35 years that commonly used sorption isotherm models fail to correctly predict wood–water properties such as heat of sorption. Despite this, their use to determine thermodynamic quantities and monolayer moisture contents persists and in fact is increasing in frequency. In this paper, we recommend the use of the “ABC isotherm,” which is mathematically equivalent to sorption isotherm models commonly used for wood but has the added benefits of simplicity, avoidance of a conceptual image of water sorption that is contradicted by measurements, and avoidance of any additional step of identifying quantities that are physically incorrect.

U2 - 10.1007/s00226-018-1035-9

DO - 10.1007/s00226-018-1035-9

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85051076164

VL - 52

SP - 1701

EP - 1706

JO - Wood Science and Technology

JF - Wood Science and Technology

SN - 0043-7719

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 203745269