Frontiers of protected areas versus forest exploitation: Assessing habitat network functionality in 16 case study regions globally

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Frontiers of protected areas versus forest exploitation : Assessing habitat network functionality in 16 case study regions globally. / Angelstam, Per; Albulescu, Andra Cosmina; Andrianambinina, Ollier Duranton F.; Aszalós, Réka; Borovichev, Eugene; Cardona, Walter Cano; Dobrynin, Denis; Fedoriak, Mariia; Firm, Dejan; Hunter, Malcolm L.; de Jong, Wil; Lindenmayer, David; Manton, Michael; Monge, Juan J.; Mezei, Pavel; Michailova, Galina; Brenes, Carlos L.Muñoz; Pastur, Guillermo Martínez; Petrova, Olga V.; Pokorny, Benny; Rafanoharana, Serge C.; Rosas, Yamina Micaela; Seymour, Bob Robert; Waeber, Patrick O.; Wilmé, Lucienne; Yamelynets, Taras; Zlatanov, Tzvetan.

In: Ambio, Vol. 50, 2021, p. 2286-2310.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Angelstam, P, Albulescu, AC, Andrianambinina, ODF, Aszalós, R, Borovichev, E, Cardona, WC, Dobrynin, D, Fedoriak, M, Firm, D, Hunter, ML, de Jong, W, Lindenmayer, D, Manton, M, Monge, JJ, Mezei, P, Michailova, G, Brenes, CLM, Pastur, GM, Petrova, OV, Pokorny, B, Rafanoharana, SC, Rosas, YM, Seymour, BR, Waeber, PO, Wilmé, L, Yamelynets, T & Zlatanov, T 2021, 'Frontiers of protected areas versus forest exploitation: Assessing habitat network functionality in 16 case study regions globally', Ambio, vol. 50, pp. 2286-2310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01628-5

APA

Angelstam, P., Albulescu, A. C., Andrianambinina, O. D. F., Aszalós, R., Borovichev, E., Cardona, W. C., Dobrynin, D., Fedoriak, M., Firm, D., Hunter, M. L., de Jong, W., Lindenmayer, D., Manton, M., Monge, J. J., Mezei, P., Michailova, G., Brenes, C. L. M., Pastur, G. M., Petrova, O. V., ... Zlatanov, T. (2021). Frontiers of protected areas versus forest exploitation: Assessing habitat network functionality in 16 case study regions globally. Ambio, 50, 2286-2310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01628-5

Vancouver

Angelstam P, Albulescu AC, Andrianambinina ODF, Aszalós R, Borovichev E, Cardona WC et al. Frontiers of protected areas versus forest exploitation: Assessing habitat network functionality in 16 case study regions globally. Ambio. 2021;50:2286-2310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01628-5

Author

Angelstam, Per ; Albulescu, Andra Cosmina ; Andrianambinina, Ollier Duranton F. ; Aszalós, Réka ; Borovichev, Eugene ; Cardona, Walter Cano ; Dobrynin, Denis ; Fedoriak, Mariia ; Firm, Dejan ; Hunter, Malcolm L. ; de Jong, Wil ; Lindenmayer, David ; Manton, Michael ; Monge, Juan J. ; Mezei, Pavel ; Michailova, Galina ; Brenes, Carlos L.Muñoz ; Pastur, Guillermo Martínez ; Petrova, Olga V. ; Pokorny, Benny ; Rafanoharana, Serge C. ; Rosas, Yamina Micaela ; Seymour, Bob Robert ; Waeber, Patrick O. ; Wilmé, Lucienne ; Yamelynets, Taras ; Zlatanov, Tzvetan. / Frontiers of protected areas versus forest exploitation : Assessing habitat network functionality in 16 case study regions globally. In: Ambio. 2021 ; Vol. 50. pp. 2286-2310.

Bibtex

@article{5a65308794624e62b52b634036d6ca00,
title = "Frontiers of protected areas versus forest exploitation: Assessing habitat network functionality in 16 case study regions globally",
abstract = "Exploitation of natural forests forms expanding frontiers. Simultaneously, protected area frontiers aim at maintaining functional habitat networks. To assess net effects of these frontiers, we examined 16 case study areas on five continents. We (1) mapped protected area instruments, (2) assessed their effectiveness, (3) mapped policy implementation tools, and (4) effects on protected areas originating from their surroundings. Results are given as follows: (1) conservation instruments covered 3–77%, (2) effectiveness of habitat networks depended on representativeness, habitat quality, functional connectivity, resource extraction in protected areas, time for landscape restoration, “paper parks”, “fortress conservation”, and data access, (3) regulatory policy instruments dominated over economic and informational, (4) negative matrix effects dominated over positive ones (protective forests, buffer zones, inaccessibility), which were restricted to former USSR and Costa Rica. Despite evidence-based knowledge about conservation targets, the importance of spatial segregation of conservation and use, and traditional knowledge, the trajectories for biodiversity conservation were generally negative.",
keywords = "Biodiversity conservation targets, Governance effectiveness, Green infrastructure, Landscape approach, Matrix effects, Policy instruments",
author = "Per Angelstam and Albulescu, {Andra Cosmina} and Andrianambinina, {Ollier Duranton F.} and R{\'e}ka Aszal{\'o}s and Eugene Borovichev and Cardona, {Walter Cano} and Denis Dobrynin and Mariia Fedoriak and Dejan Firm and Hunter, {Malcolm L.} and {de Jong}, Wil and David Lindenmayer and Michael Manton and Monge, {Juan J.} and Pavel Mezei and Galina Michailova and Brenes, {Carlos L.Mu{\~n}oz} and Pastur, {Guillermo Mart{\'i}nez} and Petrova, {Olga V.} and Benny Pokorny and Rafanoharana, {Serge C.} and Rosas, {Yamina Micaela} and Seymour, {Bob Robert} and Waeber, {Patrick O.} and Lucienne Wilm{\'e} and Taras Yamelynets and Tzvetan Zlatanov",
note = "Funding Information: Per Angelstam acknowledges funding from the Swedish research council FORMAS (grant 2017:1342) to Per Angelstam. Denis Dobrynin is grateful to the Kone Foundation for the grant no. 089989. Pavel Mezei was supported by APVV-15-0761, APVV-18-0347 and APVV-16-0306. Dejan Firm was supported by Scion{\textquoteright}s Strategic Science Investment Funding from the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021, The Author(s).",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1007/s13280-021-01628-5",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "2286--2310",
journal = "Ambio",
issn = "0044-7447",
publisher = "Springer",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Frontiers of protected areas versus forest exploitation

T2 - Assessing habitat network functionality in 16 case study regions globally

AU - Angelstam, Per

AU - Albulescu, Andra Cosmina

AU - Andrianambinina, Ollier Duranton F.

AU - Aszalós, Réka

AU - Borovichev, Eugene

AU - Cardona, Walter Cano

AU - Dobrynin, Denis

AU - Fedoriak, Mariia

AU - Firm, Dejan

AU - Hunter, Malcolm L.

AU - de Jong, Wil

AU - Lindenmayer, David

AU - Manton, Michael

AU - Monge, Juan J.

AU - Mezei, Pavel

AU - Michailova, Galina

AU - Brenes, Carlos L.Muñoz

AU - Pastur, Guillermo Martínez

AU - Petrova, Olga V.

AU - Pokorny, Benny

AU - Rafanoharana, Serge C.

AU - Rosas, Yamina Micaela

AU - Seymour, Bob Robert

AU - Waeber, Patrick O.

AU - Wilmé, Lucienne

AU - Yamelynets, Taras

AU - Zlatanov, Tzvetan

N1 - Funding Information: Per Angelstam acknowledges funding from the Swedish research council FORMAS (grant 2017:1342) to Per Angelstam. Denis Dobrynin is grateful to the Kone Foundation for the grant no. 089989. Pavel Mezei was supported by APVV-15-0761, APVV-18-0347 and APVV-16-0306. Dejan Firm was supported by Scion’s Strategic Science Investment Funding from the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment. Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s).

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Exploitation of natural forests forms expanding frontiers. Simultaneously, protected area frontiers aim at maintaining functional habitat networks. To assess net effects of these frontiers, we examined 16 case study areas on five continents. We (1) mapped protected area instruments, (2) assessed their effectiveness, (3) mapped policy implementation tools, and (4) effects on protected areas originating from their surroundings. Results are given as follows: (1) conservation instruments covered 3–77%, (2) effectiveness of habitat networks depended on representativeness, habitat quality, functional connectivity, resource extraction in protected areas, time for landscape restoration, “paper parks”, “fortress conservation”, and data access, (3) regulatory policy instruments dominated over economic and informational, (4) negative matrix effects dominated over positive ones (protective forests, buffer zones, inaccessibility), which were restricted to former USSR and Costa Rica. Despite evidence-based knowledge about conservation targets, the importance of spatial segregation of conservation and use, and traditional knowledge, the trajectories for biodiversity conservation were generally negative.

AB - Exploitation of natural forests forms expanding frontiers. Simultaneously, protected area frontiers aim at maintaining functional habitat networks. To assess net effects of these frontiers, we examined 16 case study areas on five continents. We (1) mapped protected area instruments, (2) assessed their effectiveness, (3) mapped policy implementation tools, and (4) effects on protected areas originating from their surroundings. Results are given as follows: (1) conservation instruments covered 3–77%, (2) effectiveness of habitat networks depended on representativeness, habitat quality, functional connectivity, resource extraction in protected areas, time for landscape restoration, “paper parks”, “fortress conservation”, and data access, (3) regulatory policy instruments dominated over economic and informational, (4) negative matrix effects dominated over positive ones (protective forests, buffer zones, inaccessibility), which were restricted to former USSR and Costa Rica. Despite evidence-based knowledge about conservation targets, the importance of spatial segregation of conservation and use, and traditional knowledge, the trajectories for biodiversity conservation were generally negative.

KW - Biodiversity conservation targets

KW - Governance effectiveness

KW - Green infrastructure

KW - Landscape approach

KW - Matrix effects

KW - Policy instruments

U2 - 10.1007/s13280-021-01628-5

DO - 10.1007/s13280-021-01628-5

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34657275

AN - SCOPUS:85117344760

VL - 50

SP - 2286

EP - 2310

JO - Ambio

JF - Ambio

SN - 0044-7447

ER -

ID: 339248764