Who Gives Evidence to Parliamentary Committees? A Comparative Investigation of Parliamentary Committees and their Constituencies
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Who Gives Evidence to Parliamentary Committees? A Comparative Investigation of Parliamentary Committees and their Constituencies. / Pedersen, Helene Helboe; Halpin, Darren; Rasmussen, Anne.
In: Journal of Legislative Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, 6, 2015, p. 408-427.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Who Gives Evidence to Parliamentary Committees?
T2 - A Comparative Investigation of Parliamentary Committees and their Constituencies
AU - Pedersen, Helene Helboe
AU - Halpin, Darren
AU - Rasmussen, Anne
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - This article focuses on the interaction between parliamentary committees and external actors. How is the interaction organised, and how does it influence which interests are voiced? The authors show that institutional variation in procedures for calling witnesses and variation in committee agendas influence both the composition of actors and the concentration of evidence. By composition of actors, they refer to the set of different actor types involved. By evidence concentration, they refer to the extent to which evidence is provided by a relatively small share of active actors. The study is based on a new data set of all contacts between parliamentary committees and external actors in one year across three countries: the United Kingdom, Denmark and the Netherlands. Interestingly, the findings show that procedures of invitation rather than open calls increase the diversity of actor composition and decrease the concentration of actor evidence. This, however, comes at a cost, since the overall volume of contacts is reduced.
AB - This article focuses on the interaction between parliamentary committees and external actors. How is the interaction organised, and how does it influence which interests are voiced? The authors show that institutional variation in procedures for calling witnesses and variation in committee agendas influence both the composition of actors and the concentration of evidence. By composition of actors, they refer to the set of different actor types involved. By evidence concentration, they refer to the extent to which evidence is provided by a relatively small share of active actors. The study is based on a new data set of all contacts between parliamentary committees and external actors in one year across three countries: the United Kingdom, Denmark and the Netherlands. Interestingly, the findings show that procedures of invitation rather than open calls increase the diversity of actor composition and decrease the concentration of actor evidence. This, however, comes at a cost, since the overall volume of contacts is reduced.
KW - Faculty of Social Sciences
KW - comparative study
KW - interest groups
KW - institutions
KW - parliamentary committees
KW - Representation
U2 - 10.1080/13572334.2015.1042292
DO - 10.1080/13572334.2015.1042292
M3 - Journal article
VL - 21
SP - 408
EP - 427
JO - The Journal of Legislative Studies
JF - The Journal of Legislative Studies
SN - 1357-2334
IS - 3
M1 - 6
ER -
ID: 106153253