Nature-based biopsychosocial resilience: An integrative theoretical framework for research on nature and health

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Documents

  • Fulltext

    Final published version, 2.42 MB, PDF document

  • Mathew P. White
  • Terry Hartig
  • Leanne Martin
  • Sabine Pahl
  • Agnes E. van den Berg
  • Nancy M. Wells
  • Caroline Costongs
  • Angel M. Dzhambov
  • Lewis R. Elliott
  • Alba Godfrey
  • Arnulf Hartl
  • Cecil Konijnendijk
  • Jill S. Litt
  • Rebecca Lovell
  • Freddie Lymeus
  • Colm O'Driscoll
  • Christina Pichler
  • Sarai Pouso
  • Nooshin Razani
  • Laura Secco
  • Maximilian O. Steininger
  • Maria Uyarra
  • Matilda van den Bosch

Nature-based solutions including urban forests and wetlands can help communities cope better with climate change and other environmental stressors by enhancing social-ecological resilience. Natural ecosystems, settings, elements and affordances can also help individuals become more personally resilient to a variety of stressors, although the mechanisms underpinning individual-level nature-based resilience, and their relations to social-ecological resilience, are not well articulated. We propose ‘nature-based biopsychosocial resilience theory’ (NBRT) to address these gaps. Our framework begins by suggesting that individual-level resilience can refer to both: a) a person's set of adaptive resources; and b) the processes by which these resources are deployed. Drawing on existing nature-health perspectives, we argue that nature contact can support individuals build and maintain biological, psychological, and social (i.e. biopsychosocial) resilience-related resources. Together with nature-based social-ecological resilience, these biopsychosocial resilience resources can: i) reduce the risk of various stressors (preventive resilience); ii) enhance adaptive reactions to stressful circumstances (response resilience), and/or iii) facilitate more rapid and/or complete recovery from stress (recovery resilience). Reference to these three resilience processes supports integration across more familiar pathways involving harm reduction, capacity building, and restoration. Evidence in support of the theory, potential interventions to promote nature-based biopsychosocial resilience, and issues that require further consideration are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Article number108234
JournalEnvironment International
Volume181
Number of pages19
ISSN0160-4120
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors

    Research areas

  • Bluespace, Coping, Greenspace, Nature-based solutions, Nature-based therapies

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk


No data available

ID: 368571939