Plans for urban green infrastructure in Scandinavia
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Plans for urban green infrastructure in Scandinavia. / Nordh, Helena; Olafsson, Anton Stahl.
In: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Vol. 64, No. 5, 2021, p. 1-22.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Plans for urban green infrastructure in Scandinavia
AU - Nordh, Helena
AU - Olafsson, Anton Stahl
N1 - doi: 10.1080/09640568.2020.1787960
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Scandinavian countries are often mentioned as forerunners in sustainable urban development; here, green infrastructure (GI) planning has played an important role. However, little is known about the status of GI planning at a municipal level—this paper aims to provide such knowledge. In an analysis of GI plans or municipal master plans from 24 municipalities in Scandinavia, we explored the scope of the plans, the focus of the goals/strategies, the terminology, and the measures for access to green spaces. The results show that all the municipalities had strategies for GI, but only 60% had a GI plan or a similar “greenspace” document. Social values were the main focus of the plans, particularly recreation and access. GI was a concept more commonly used in practice compared with ecosystem services. The findings confirm a common Scandinavian approach to urban GI planning, which provides a relevant general frame for future globally strategic GI planning.
AB - Scandinavian countries are often mentioned as forerunners in sustainable urban development; here, green infrastructure (GI) planning has played an important role. However, little is known about the status of GI planning at a municipal level—this paper aims to provide such knowledge. In an analysis of GI plans or municipal master plans from 24 municipalities in Scandinavia, we explored the scope of the plans, the focus of the goals/strategies, the terminology, and the measures for access to green spaces. The results show that all the municipalities had strategies for GI, but only 60% had a GI plan or a similar “greenspace” document. Social values were the main focus of the plans, particularly recreation and access. GI was a concept more commonly used in practice compared with ecosystem services. The findings confirm a common Scandinavian approach to urban GI planning, which provides a relevant general frame for future globally strategic GI planning.
U2 - 10.1080/09640568.2020.1787960
DO - 10.1080/09640568.2020.1787960
M3 - Journal article
VL - 64
SP - 1
EP - 22
JO - Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
JF - Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
SN - 0964-0568
IS - 5
ER -
ID: 247940827