GPS Tracking Data on Marginalised Citizens’ Spatial Patterns: Towards Inclusive Urban Planning

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

GPS Tracking Data on Marginalised Citizens’ Spatial Patterns : Towards Inclusive Urban Planning. / Carstensen, Trine Agervig; Skov-Petersen, Hans.

In: Urban Planning, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2023, p. 133-144.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Carstensen, TA & Skov-Petersen, H 2023, 'GPS Tracking Data on Marginalised Citizens’ Spatial Patterns: Towards Inclusive Urban Planning', Urban Planning, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 133-144. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v8i2.6524

APA

Carstensen, T. A., & Skov-Petersen, H. (2023). GPS Tracking Data on Marginalised Citizens’ Spatial Patterns: Towards Inclusive Urban Planning. Urban Planning, 8(2), 133-144. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v8i2.6524

Vancouver

Carstensen TA, Skov-Petersen H. GPS Tracking Data on Marginalised Citizens’ Spatial Patterns: Towards Inclusive Urban Planning. Urban Planning. 2023;8(2):133-144. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v8i2.6524

Author

Carstensen, Trine Agervig ; Skov-Petersen, Hans. / GPS Tracking Data on Marginalised Citizens’ Spatial Patterns : Towards Inclusive Urban Planning. In: Urban Planning. 2023 ; Vol. 8, No. 2. pp. 133-144.

Bibtex

@article{fcb1f0acd02e426dac683ba3c674912e,
title = "GPS Tracking Data on Marginalised Citizens{\textquoteright} Spatial Patterns: Towards Inclusive Urban Planning",
abstract = "Knowledge about how marginalised citizens use urban spaces is hard to access and apply in urban planning and policy. Based on current debates around “smart cities” and “smart governance,” the City of Odense, in Denmark, has tested the integration of “smart engagement” by means of GPS‐tracking techniques into the municipality{\textquoteright}s cross‐sectoral strategy for an “inclusive city.” In a period of austerity, cities have the incentive to optimise public services. Hence, GPS‐tracking data was produced by 64 marginalised citizens, resulting in a data inventory covering three weeks of spatial behaviour. First, this article shows how these GPS‐tracking data were processed into maps without revealing person‐sensitive spatial patterns. Secondly, the article explores whether such maps and the GPS‐tracking techniques that underpin them are considered valid, relevant, and applicable to urban planning from the perspectives of marginalised citizens, their representatives, and municipal planners and professionals respectively. The GPS project showed shortcomings as regards the quality of the data inventory and the representativity of the mapped behaviour, which made them inapplicable for optimising dedicated public service. However, the article also finds that the GPS‐based maps succeeded in being non‐person sensitive and in pro-viding a valuable platform for citizen‐centric dialogues with marginalised citizens with the potential for raising awareness and increasing knowledge about this citizen group{\textquoteright}s living conditions and urban lives. An important derived effect of the project is that it has ensured ongoing cross‐sectoral collaboration among a range of professional stakeholders, imperative for ensuring creating greater equity in urban planning.",
keywords = "GPS tracking, inclusive cities, marginalised citizens, Odense, public spaces, smart cities, smart engagement, smart governance",
author = "Carstensen, {Trine Agervig} and Hans Skov-Petersen",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 by the author(s); licensee Cogitatio Press (Lisbon, Portugal).",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.17645/up.v8i2.6524",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "133--144",
journal = "Urban Planning",
issn = "2183-7635",
publisher = "Cogitatio Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - GPS Tracking Data on Marginalised Citizens’ Spatial Patterns

T2 - Towards Inclusive Urban Planning

AU - Carstensen, Trine Agervig

AU - Skov-Petersen, Hans

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 by the author(s); licensee Cogitatio Press (Lisbon, Portugal).

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Knowledge about how marginalised citizens use urban spaces is hard to access and apply in urban planning and policy. Based on current debates around “smart cities” and “smart governance,” the City of Odense, in Denmark, has tested the integration of “smart engagement” by means of GPS‐tracking techniques into the municipality’s cross‐sectoral strategy for an “inclusive city.” In a period of austerity, cities have the incentive to optimise public services. Hence, GPS‐tracking data was produced by 64 marginalised citizens, resulting in a data inventory covering three weeks of spatial behaviour. First, this article shows how these GPS‐tracking data were processed into maps without revealing person‐sensitive spatial patterns. Secondly, the article explores whether such maps and the GPS‐tracking techniques that underpin them are considered valid, relevant, and applicable to urban planning from the perspectives of marginalised citizens, their representatives, and municipal planners and professionals respectively. The GPS project showed shortcomings as regards the quality of the data inventory and the representativity of the mapped behaviour, which made them inapplicable for optimising dedicated public service. However, the article also finds that the GPS‐based maps succeeded in being non‐person sensitive and in pro-viding a valuable platform for citizen‐centric dialogues with marginalised citizens with the potential for raising awareness and increasing knowledge about this citizen group’s living conditions and urban lives. An important derived effect of the project is that it has ensured ongoing cross‐sectoral collaboration among a range of professional stakeholders, imperative for ensuring creating greater equity in urban planning.

AB - Knowledge about how marginalised citizens use urban spaces is hard to access and apply in urban planning and policy. Based on current debates around “smart cities” and “smart governance,” the City of Odense, in Denmark, has tested the integration of “smart engagement” by means of GPS‐tracking techniques into the municipality’s cross‐sectoral strategy for an “inclusive city.” In a period of austerity, cities have the incentive to optimise public services. Hence, GPS‐tracking data was produced by 64 marginalised citizens, resulting in a data inventory covering three weeks of spatial behaviour. First, this article shows how these GPS‐tracking data were processed into maps without revealing person‐sensitive spatial patterns. Secondly, the article explores whether such maps and the GPS‐tracking techniques that underpin them are considered valid, relevant, and applicable to urban planning from the perspectives of marginalised citizens, their representatives, and municipal planners and professionals respectively. The GPS project showed shortcomings as regards the quality of the data inventory and the representativity of the mapped behaviour, which made them inapplicable for optimising dedicated public service. However, the article also finds that the GPS‐based maps succeeded in being non‐person sensitive and in pro-viding a valuable platform for citizen‐centric dialogues with marginalised citizens with the potential for raising awareness and increasing knowledge about this citizen group’s living conditions and urban lives. An important derived effect of the project is that it has ensured ongoing cross‐sectoral collaboration among a range of professional stakeholders, imperative for ensuring creating greater equity in urban planning.

KW - GPS tracking

KW - inclusive cities

KW - marginalised citizens

KW - Odense

KW - public spaces

KW - smart cities

KW - smart engagement

KW - smart governance

U2 - 10.17645/up.v8i2.6524

DO - 10.17645/up.v8i2.6524

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85154034916

VL - 8

SP - 133

EP - 144

JO - Urban Planning

JF - Urban Planning

SN - 2183-7635

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 370904041