GPS Tracking Data on Marginalised Citizens’ Spatial Patterns: Towards Inclusive Urban Planning
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
GPS Tracking Data on Marginalised Citizens’ Spatial Patterns : Towards Inclusive Urban Planning. / Carstensen, Trine Agervig; Skov-Petersen, Hans.
In: Urban Planning, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2023, p. 133-144.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - GPS Tracking Data on Marginalised Citizens’ Spatial Patterns
T2 - Towards Inclusive Urban Planning
AU - Carstensen, Trine Agervig
AU - Skov-Petersen, Hans
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 by the author(s); licensee Cogitatio Press (Lisbon, Portugal).
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Knowledge about how marginalised citizens use urban spaces is hard to access and apply in urban planning and policy. Based on current debates around “smart cities” and “smart governance,” the City of Odense, in Denmark, has tested the integration of “smart engagement” by means of GPS‐tracking techniques into the municipality’s cross‐sectoral strategy for an “inclusive city.” In a period of austerity, cities have the incentive to optimise public services. Hence, GPS‐tracking data was produced by 64 marginalised citizens, resulting in a data inventory covering three weeks of spatial behaviour. First, this article shows how these GPS‐tracking data were processed into maps without revealing person‐sensitive spatial patterns. Secondly, the article explores whether such maps and the GPS‐tracking techniques that underpin them are considered valid, relevant, and applicable to urban planning from the perspectives of marginalised citizens, their representatives, and municipal planners and professionals respectively. The GPS project showed shortcomings as regards the quality of the data inventory and the representativity of the mapped behaviour, which made them inapplicable for optimising dedicated public service. However, the article also finds that the GPS‐based maps succeeded in being non‐person sensitive and in pro-viding a valuable platform for citizen‐centric dialogues with marginalised citizens with the potential for raising awareness and increasing knowledge about this citizen group’s living conditions and urban lives. An important derived effect of the project is that it has ensured ongoing cross‐sectoral collaboration among a range of professional stakeholders, imperative for ensuring creating greater equity in urban planning.
AB - Knowledge about how marginalised citizens use urban spaces is hard to access and apply in urban planning and policy. Based on current debates around “smart cities” and “smart governance,” the City of Odense, in Denmark, has tested the integration of “smart engagement” by means of GPS‐tracking techniques into the municipality’s cross‐sectoral strategy for an “inclusive city.” In a period of austerity, cities have the incentive to optimise public services. Hence, GPS‐tracking data was produced by 64 marginalised citizens, resulting in a data inventory covering three weeks of spatial behaviour. First, this article shows how these GPS‐tracking data were processed into maps without revealing person‐sensitive spatial patterns. Secondly, the article explores whether such maps and the GPS‐tracking techniques that underpin them are considered valid, relevant, and applicable to urban planning from the perspectives of marginalised citizens, their representatives, and municipal planners and professionals respectively. The GPS project showed shortcomings as regards the quality of the data inventory and the representativity of the mapped behaviour, which made them inapplicable for optimising dedicated public service. However, the article also finds that the GPS‐based maps succeeded in being non‐person sensitive and in pro-viding a valuable platform for citizen‐centric dialogues with marginalised citizens with the potential for raising awareness and increasing knowledge about this citizen group’s living conditions and urban lives. An important derived effect of the project is that it has ensured ongoing cross‐sectoral collaboration among a range of professional stakeholders, imperative for ensuring creating greater equity in urban planning.
KW - GPS tracking
KW - inclusive cities
KW - marginalised citizens
KW - Odense
KW - public spaces
KW - smart cities
KW - smart engagement
KW - smart governance
U2 - 10.17645/up.v8i2.6524
DO - 10.17645/up.v8i2.6524
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85154034916
VL - 8
SP - 133
EP - 144
JO - Urban Planning
JF - Urban Planning
SN - 2183-7635
IS - 2
ER -
ID: 370904041