Hybridisation and chloroplast capture between distinct Themeda triandra lineages in Australia

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

  • Fulltext

    Forlagets udgivne version, 2,15 MB, PDF-dokument

  • Luke T. Dunning
  • Olofsson, Jill Katharina
  • Alexander S. T. Papadopulos
  • Samuel G.S. Hibdige
  • Oriane Hidalgo
  • Ilia J. Leitch
  • Paulo C. Baleeiro
  • Sinethemba Ntshangase
  • Nigel Barker
  • Richard W. Jobson

Ecotypes are distinct populations within a species that are adapted to specific environmental conditions. Understanding how these ecotypes become established, and how they interact when reunited, is fundamental to elucidating how ecological adaptations are maintained. This study focuses on Themeda triandra, a dominant grassland species across Asia, Africa and Australia. It is the most widespread plant in Australia, where it has distinct ecotypes that are usually restricted to either wetter and cooler coastal regions or the drier and hotter interior. We generate a reference genome for T. triandra and use whole genome sequencing for over 80 Themeda accessions to reconstruct the evolutionary history of T. triandra and related taxa. Organelle phylogenies confirm that Australia was colonized by T. triandra twice, with the division between ecotypes predating their arrival in Australia. The nuclear genome provides evidence of differences in the dominant ploidal level and gene-flow among the ecotypes. In northern Queensland there appears to be a hybrid zone between ecotypes with admixed nuclear genomes and shared chloroplast haplotypes. Conversely, in the cracking claypans of Western Australia, there is cytonuclear discordance with individuals possessing the coastal chloroplast and interior clade nuclear genome. This chloroplast capture is potentially a result of adaptive introgression, with selection detected in the rpoC2 gene which is associated with water use efficiency. The reason that T. triandra is the most widespread plant in Australia appears to be a result of distinct ecotypic genetic variation and genome duplication, with the importance of each depending on the geographic scale considered.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftMolecular Ecology
Vol/bind31
Udgave nummer22
Sider (fra-til)5846–5860
Antal sider15
ISSN0962-1083
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2022

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
We thank Natalie Murdock and Hayden Ajduk (Rio Tinto Mining), Steven Dillon (PERTH), and Andrew Mitchell (Perth, WA) for help with images, fieldwork and identification of specimens. We would also like to thank Richard Abbott and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments. We are grateful for access to collections and provision of loans by managers and staff at AD, AK, BRI, CANB, CNS, DNA, HO, MEL, NSW, PERTH, SING. The Australian Biological Resource Study (ABRS) and Rio Tinto Mining provided funding for this research. LTD is supported by a Natural Environment Research Council Independent Research Fellowship (NE/T011025/1). NPB and SN thank the National Research Foundation of South Africa for financial support (grant unique no. 102653).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Molecular Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

ID: 321838720