Fostering change to sustainable consumption and production: An evidence based view

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Fostering change to sustainable consumption and production : An evidence based view. / Tukker, Arnold; Emmert, Sophie; Charter, Martin; Vezzoli, Carlo; Sto, Eivind; Andersen, Maj Munch; Geerken, Theo; Tischner, Ursula; Lahlou, Saadi.

I: Journal of Cleaner Production, Bind 16, Nr. 11, 2008, s. 1218-1225.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Tukker, A, Emmert, S, Charter, M, Vezzoli, C, Sto, E, Andersen, MM, Geerken, T, Tischner, U & Lahlou, S 2008, 'Fostering change to sustainable consumption and production: An evidence based view', Journal of Cleaner Production, bind 16, nr. 11, s. 1218-1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.08.015

APA

Tukker, A., Emmert, S., Charter, M., Vezzoli, C., Sto, E., Andersen, M. M., Geerken, T., Tischner, U., & Lahlou, S. (2008). Fostering change to sustainable consumption and production: An evidence based view. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(11), 1218-1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.08.015

Vancouver

Tukker A, Emmert S, Charter M, Vezzoli C, Sto E, Andersen MM o.a. Fostering change to sustainable consumption and production: An evidence based view. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2008;16(11):1218-1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.08.015

Author

Tukker, Arnold ; Emmert, Sophie ; Charter, Martin ; Vezzoli, Carlo ; Sto, Eivind ; Andersen, Maj Munch ; Geerken, Theo ; Tischner, Ursula ; Lahlou, Saadi. / Fostering change to sustainable consumption and production : An evidence based view. I: Journal of Cleaner Production. 2008 ; Bind 16, Nr. 11. s. 1218-1225.

Bibtex

@article{6d51769b4900439580475bc73733ffeb,
title = "Fostering change to sustainable consumption and production: An evidence based view",
abstract = "This {"}Note from the field,{"} is an edited version of a policy brief summarizing the key findings from the first half of the Sustainable Consumption Research Exchange network (SCORE!) for the policy programs in the field of sustainable consumption and production (SCP). We recommend a framework for action to change to SCP that mentions the key domains to include food, mobility, and energy use/housing (the last two clearly related to urban development). It should use a systemic perspective on the SCP challenge and differentiate between developed, fast developing, and base of the pyramid economies. SCORE! focuses mainly on developed economics, and here we propose to differentiate between: (1) measures that fit with mainstream beliefs and paradigms. Here, governments could-make operational agreements on implementation of instruments like green public procurement, stimulating ecodesign, etc. (2) Problems where a rough agreement on goals exists, but where change is radical, or means are uncertain, and hence planning difficult. Here, governments could foster visioning, experimentation, and support e.g. international collaboration in leapfrogging programs. (3) Problems that outright clash with the mainstream beliefs and paradigms. Here, governments could foster informed deliberation on the more fundamental issues related to markets, governance and growth. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
author = "Arnold Tukker and Sophie Emmert and Martin Charter and Carlo Vezzoli and Eivind Sto and Andersen, {Maj Munch} and Theo Geerken and Ursula Tischner and Saadi Lahlou",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.08.015",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "1218--1225",
journal = "Journal of Cleaner Production",
issn = "0959-6526",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fostering change to sustainable consumption and production

T2 - An evidence based view

AU - Tukker, Arnold

AU - Emmert, Sophie

AU - Charter, Martin

AU - Vezzoli, Carlo

AU - Sto, Eivind

AU - Andersen, Maj Munch

AU - Geerken, Theo

AU - Tischner, Ursula

AU - Lahlou, Saadi

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - This "Note from the field," is an edited version of a policy brief summarizing the key findings from the first half of the Sustainable Consumption Research Exchange network (SCORE!) for the policy programs in the field of sustainable consumption and production (SCP). We recommend a framework for action to change to SCP that mentions the key domains to include food, mobility, and energy use/housing (the last two clearly related to urban development). It should use a systemic perspective on the SCP challenge and differentiate between developed, fast developing, and base of the pyramid economies. SCORE! focuses mainly on developed economics, and here we propose to differentiate between: (1) measures that fit with mainstream beliefs and paradigms. Here, governments could-make operational agreements on implementation of instruments like green public procurement, stimulating ecodesign, etc. (2) Problems where a rough agreement on goals exists, but where change is radical, or means are uncertain, and hence planning difficult. Here, governments could foster visioning, experimentation, and support e.g. international collaboration in leapfrogging programs. (3) Problems that outright clash with the mainstream beliefs and paradigms. Here, governments could foster informed deliberation on the more fundamental issues related to markets, governance and growth. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - This "Note from the field," is an edited version of a policy brief summarizing the key findings from the first half of the Sustainable Consumption Research Exchange network (SCORE!) for the policy programs in the field of sustainable consumption and production (SCP). We recommend a framework for action to change to SCP that mentions the key domains to include food, mobility, and energy use/housing (the last two clearly related to urban development). It should use a systemic perspective on the SCP challenge and differentiate between developed, fast developing, and base of the pyramid economies. SCORE! focuses mainly on developed economics, and here we propose to differentiate between: (1) measures that fit with mainstream beliefs and paradigms. Here, governments could-make operational agreements on implementation of instruments like green public procurement, stimulating ecodesign, etc. (2) Problems where a rough agreement on goals exists, but where change is radical, or means are uncertain, and hence planning difficult. Here, governments could foster visioning, experimentation, and support e.g. international collaboration in leapfrogging programs. (3) Problems that outright clash with the mainstream beliefs and paradigms. Here, governments could foster informed deliberation on the more fundamental issues related to markets, governance and growth. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.08.015

DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.08.015

M3 - Journal article

VL - 16

SP - 1218

EP - 1225

JO - Journal of Cleaner Production

JF - Journal of Cleaner Production

SN - 0959-6526

IS - 11

ER -

ID: 354035641