Multi-level, multi-component approaches to community based interventions for healthy living—a three case comparison

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Multi-level, multi-component approaches to community based interventions for healthy living—a three case comparison. / Mikkelsen, Bent Egberg; Novotny, Rachel; Gittelsohn, Joel.

I: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Bind 13, Nr. 10, 1023, 01.10.2016.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Mikkelsen, BE, Novotny, R & Gittelsohn, J 2016, 'Multi-level, multi-component approaches to community based interventions for healthy living—a three case comparison', International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, bind 13, nr. 10, 1023. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13101023

APA

Mikkelsen, B. E., Novotny, R., & Gittelsohn, J. (2016). Multi-level, multi-component approaches to community based interventions for healthy living—a three case comparison. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(10), [1023]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13101023

Vancouver

Mikkelsen BE, Novotny R, Gittelsohn J. Multi-level, multi-component approaches to community based interventions for healthy living—a three case comparison. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2016 okt. 1;13(10). 1023. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13101023

Author

Mikkelsen, Bent Egberg ; Novotny, Rachel ; Gittelsohn, Joel. / Multi-level, multi-component approaches to community based interventions for healthy living—a three case comparison. I: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2016 ; Bind 13, Nr. 10.

Bibtex

@article{e16f686e592d4717b044ff5b053e7390,
title = "Multi-level, multi-component approaches to community based interventions for healthy living—a three case comparison",
abstract = "There is increasing interest in integrated and coordinated programs that intervene in multiple community settings/institutions at the same time and involve policy and system changes. The purpose of the paper is to analyse three comparable cases of Multi Level, Multi Component intervention programs (ML-MC) from across the world in order to give recommendations for research, policy and practice in this field. Through the comparison of three cases: Health and Local Community (SoL-program), Children{\textquoteright}s Healthy Living (CHL) and B{\textquoteright}More Healthy Communities for Kids (BHCK), this paper examines the potential of ML-MC community-based public health nutrition interventions to create sustainable change. The paper proposes methodology, guidelines and directions for future research through analysis and examination strengths and weaknesses in the programs. Similarities are that they engage and commit local stakeholders in a structured approach to integrate intervention components in order to create dose and intensity. In that way, they all make provisions for post intervention impact sustainability. All programs target the child and family members{\textquoteright} knowledge, attitudes, behavior, the policy level, and the environmental level. The study illustrates the diversity in communities as well as diversity in terms of which and how sites and settings such as schools, kindergartens, community groups and grocery stores became involved in the programs. Programs are also different in terms of involvement of media stakeholders. The comparison of the three cases suggests that there is a need to build collaboration and partnerships from the beginning, plan for sufficient intensity/dose, emphasize/create consistency across levels and components of the intervention, build synchronization across levels, and plan for sustainability.",
keywords = "B{\textquoteright}More healthy communities for kids (BHCK), Children{\textquoteright}s healthy living (CHL), Community health programs, Health and local community (SoL-program), Healthy living, Multi component interventions, Multi-level interventions",
author = "Mikkelsen, {Bent Egberg} and Rachel Novotny and Joel Gittelsohn",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.",
year = "2016",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.3390/ijerph13101023",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health",
issn = "1661-7827",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multi-level, multi-component approaches to community based interventions for healthy living—a three case comparison

AU - Mikkelsen, Bent Egberg

AU - Novotny, Rachel

AU - Gittelsohn, Joel

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - There is increasing interest in integrated and coordinated programs that intervene in multiple community settings/institutions at the same time and involve policy and system changes. The purpose of the paper is to analyse three comparable cases of Multi Level, Multi Component intervention programs (ML-MC) from across the world in order to give recommendations for research, policy and practice in this field. Through the comparison of three cases: Health and Local Community (SoL-program), Children’s Healthy Living (CHL) and B’More Healthy Communities for Kids (BHCK), this paper examines the potential of ML-MC community-based public health nutrition interventions to create sustainable change. The paper proposes methodology, guidelines and directions for future research through analysis and examination strengths and weaknesses in the programs. Similarities are that they engage and commit local stakeholders in a structured approach to integrate intervention components in order to create dose and intensity. In that way, they all make provisions for post intervention impact sustainability. All programs target the child and family members’ knowledge, attitudes, behavior, the policy level, and the environmental level. The study illustrates the diversity in communities as well as diversity in terms of which and how sites and settings such as schools, kindergartens, community groups and grocery stores became involved in the programs. Programs are also different in terms of involvement of media stakeholders. The comparison of the three cases suggests that there is a need to build collaboration and partnerships from the beginning, plan for sufficient intensity/dose, emphasize/create consistency across levels and components of the intervention, build synchronization across levels, and plan for sustainability.

AB - There is increasing interest in integrated and coordinated programs that intervene in multiple community settings/institutions at the same time and involve policy and system changes. The purpose of the paper is to analyse three comparable cases of Multi Level, Multi Component intervention programs (ML-MC) from across the world in order to give recommendations for research, policy and practice in this field. Through the comparison of three cases: Health and Local Community (SoL-program), Children’s Healthy Living (CHL) and B’More Healthy Communities for Kids (BHCK), this paper examines the potential of ML-MC community-based public health nutrition interventions to create sustainable change. The paper proposes methodology, guidelines and directions for future research through analysis and examination strengths and weaknesses in the programs. Similarities are that they engage and commit local stakeholders in a structured approach to integrate intervention components in order to create dose and intensity. In that way, they all make provisions for post intervention impact sustainability. All programs target the child and family members’ knowledge, attitudes, behavior, the policy level, and the environmental level. The study illustrates the diversity in communities as well as diversity in terms of which and how sites and settings such as schools, kindergartens, community groups and grocery stores became involved in the programs. Programs are also different in terms of involvement of media stakeholders. The comparison of the three cases suggests that there is a need to build collaboration and partnerships from the beginning, plan for sufficient intensity/dose, emphasize/create consistency across levels and components of the intervention, build synchronization across levels, and plan for sustainability.

KW - B’More healthy communities for kids (BHCK)

KW - Children’s healthy living (CHL)

KW - Community health programs

KW - Health and local community (SoL-program)

KW - Healthy living

KW - Multi component interventions

KW - Multi-level interventions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992159879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/ijerph13101023

DO - 10.3390/ijerph13101023

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 27775630

AN - SCOPUS:84992159879

VL - 13

JO - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

SN - 1661-7827

IS - 10

M1 - 1023

ER -

ID: 345861393