Participatory forest management for more than a decade in Tanzania: does it live up to its goals?
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Participatory forest management for more than a decade in Tanzania : does it live up to its goals? / Ngaga, Y. M.; Treue, Thorsten; Meilby, Henrik; Lund, Jens Friis; Kajembe, G. C.; Chamshama, S. A. O.; Theilade, Ida; Njana, M. A.; Ngowi, S. E.; Mwakalukwa, E. E.; Isango, J. A. K.; Burgess, Neil David.
I: Tanzania Journal of Forestry and Nature Conservation, Bind 83, Nr. 1, 2013, s. 28-42.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Participatory forest management for more than a decade in Tanzania
T2 - does it live up to its goals?
AU - Ngaga, Y. M.
AU - Treue, Thorsten
AU - Meilby, Henrik
AU - Lund, Jens Friis
AU - Kajembe, G. C.
AU - Chamshama, S. A. O.
AU - Theilade, Ida
AU - Njana, M. A.
AU - Ngowi, S. E.
AU - Mwakalukwa, E. E.
AU - Isango, J. A. K.
AU - Burgess, Neil David
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - In Tanzania, Participatory Forest Management (PFM) was introduced in order to address the challenge of deforestation which continues at alarming rate. Equally, PFM aimed to involve communities adjacent to forests in management of forest resources while at the same time accrue economic benefits. PFM consists of Community Based Forest Management (CBFM) and Joint Forest Management (JFM). CBFM takes place on village land, in forests that are owned by the village while JFM takes place in Central or Local Government forest reserves (FRs) whereby owner of the FR and adjacent communities jointly manage and share benefits accrued from the FR. This study aimed to assess the role of PFM in sustainable exploitation of forest resources, equitable economic benefits and good forest governance. Generally, the study concludes that PFM can and does contribute to sustainable utilisation of forest resources and that, households across wealth categories benefit economically from PFM. However, there is a slight tendency that the rich benefit more than the poor. Similarly, the study concludes that, while CBFM and JFM have formally established appropriate institutions for PFM, this has not promoted enfranchisement and inclusiveness. The problem of elite capture in PFM should be addressed through information and education.
AB - In Tanzania, Participatory Forest Management (PFM) was introduced in order to address the challenge of deforestation which continues at alarming rate. Equally, PFM aimed to involve communities adjacent to forests in management of forest resources while at the same time accrue economic benefits. PFM consists of Community Based Forest Management (CBFM) and Joint Forest Management (JFM). CBFM takes place on village land, in forests that are owned by the village while JFM takes place in Central or Local Government forest reserves (FRs) whereby owner of the FR and adjacent communities jointly manage and share benefits accrued from the FR. This study aimed to assess the role of PFM in sustainable exploitation of forest resources, equitable economic benefits and good forest governance. Generally, the study concludes that PFM can and does contribute to sustainable utilisation of forest resources and that, households across wealth categories benefit economically from PFM. However, there is a slight tendency that the rich benefit more than the poor. Similarly, the study concludes that, while CBFM and JFM have formally established appropriate institutions for PFM, this has not promoted enfranchisement and inclusiveness. The problem of elite capture in PFM should be addressed through information and education.
M3 - Journal article
VL - 83
SP - 28
EP - 42
JO - Tanzania Journal of Forestry and Nature Conservation
JF - Tanzania Journal of Forestry and Nature Conservation
IS - 1
ER -
ID: 99878695