Comparison of SWMM evaporation and discharge to in-field observations from lined permeable pavements

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Comparison of SWMM evaporation and discharge to in-field observations from lined permeable pavements. / Randall, Mark; Støvring, Jan; Henrichs, Malte; Bergen Jensen, Marina.

In: Urban Water Journal, Vol. 17, No. 6, 2020, p. 1-12.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Randall, M, Støvring, J, Henrichs, M & Bergen Jensen, M 2020, 'Comparison of SWMM evaporation and discharge to in-field observations from lined permeable pavements', Urban Water Journal, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2020.1776737

APA

Randall, M., Støvring, J., Henrichs, M., & Bergen Jensen, M. (2020). Comparison of SWMM evaporation and discharge to in-field observations from lined permeable pavements. Urban Water Journal, 17(6), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2020.1776737

Vancouver

Randall M, Støvring J, Henrichs M, Bergen Jensen M. Comparison of SWMM evaporation and discharge to in-field observations from lined permeable pavements. Urban Water Journal. 2020;17(6):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2020.1776737

Author

Randall, Mark ; Støvring, Jan ; Henrichs, Malte ; Bergen Jensen, Marina. / Comparison of SWMM evaporation and discharge to in-field observations from lined permeable pavements. In: Urban Water Journal. 2020 ; Vol. 17, No. 6. pp. 1-12.

Bibtex

@article{b7efd28e112144f0b712c6495d770006,
title = "Comparison of SWMM evaporation and discharge to in-field observations from lined permeable pavements",
abstract = "Limited documentation exists regarding parameterization of SWMM{\textquoteright}s permeable pavement module and whether the output is realistic, particularly for long-term simulations. In this paper, we evaluated SWMM{\textquoteright}s ability to replicate discharge and evaporation from three lined permeable pavement stalls. An assessment of parameter sensitivity identified the permeable pavement module{\textquoteright}s input parameters with the highest relative sensitivity. Agreement between observations over a 1-year period and output from the calibrated model was inconsistent for 18 modelled rainfall events. While event volumes and shapes were matched relatively well for two concrete paver stalls for simple single-peak events, more complex multi-peak events showed poor agreement for all stalls. The porous asphalt stall was modelled least satisfactorily, due to its retention capacity that cannot be represented in the model. Based on the findings of this study, an evaporation coefficient (between 0.2 and 0.9), should be applied for long-term simulations of permeable pavement for best results.",
keywords = "continuous modelling, evaporation, LID, Permeable pavement, sensitivity analysis, SWMM",
author = "Mark Randall and Jan St{\o}vring and Malte Henrichs and {Bergen Jensen}, Marina",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1080/1573062X.2020.1776737",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "1--12",
journal = "Urban Water Journal",
issn = "1573-062X",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of SWMM evaporation and discharge to in-field observations from lined permeable pavements

AU - Randall, Mark

AU - Støvring, Jan

AU - Henrichs, Malte

AU - Bergen Jensen, Marina

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Limited documentation exists regarding parameterization of SWMM’s permeable pavement module and whether the output is realistic, particularly for long-term simulations. In this paper, we evaluated SWMM’s ability to replicate discharge and evaporation from three lined permeable pavement stalls. An assessment of parameter sensitivity identified the permeable pavement module’s input parameters with the highest relative sensitivity. Agreement between observations over a 1-year period and output from the calibrated model was inconsistent for 18 modelled rainfall events. While event volumes and shapes were matched relatively well for two concrete paver stalls for simple single-peak events, more complex multi-peak events showed poor agreement for all stalls. The porous asphalt stall was modelled least satisfactorily, due to its retention capacity that cannot be represented in the model. Based on the findings of this study, an evaporation coefficient (between 0.2 and 0.9), should be applied for long-term simulations of permeable pavement for best results.

AB - Limited documentation exists regarding parameterization of SWMM’s permeable pavement module and whether the output is realistic, particularly for long-term simulations. In this paper, we evaluated SWMM’s ability to replicate discharge and evaporation from three lined permeable pavement stalls. An assessment of parameter sensitivity identified the permeable pavement module’s input parameters with the highest relative sensitivity. Agreement between observations over a 1-year period and output from the calibrated model was inconsistent for 18 modelled rainfall events. While event volumes and shapes were matched relatively well for two concrete paver stalls for simple single-peak events, more complex multi-peak events showed poor agreement for all stalls. The porous asphalt stall was modelled least satisfactorily, due to its retention capacity that cannot be represented in the model. Based on the findings of this study, an evaporation coefficient (between 0.2 and 0.9), should be applied for long-term simulations of permeable pavement for best results.

KW - continuous modelling

KW - evaporation

KW - LID

KW - Permeable pavement

KW - sensitivity analysis

KW - SWMM

U2 - 10.1080/1573062X.2020.1776737

DO - 10.1080/1573062X.2020.1776737

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85087620701

VL - 17

SP - 1

EP - 12

JO - Urban Water Journal

JF - Urban Water Journal

SN - 1573-062X

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 245077462