Density heterogeneity of the cratonic lithosphere: a case study of the Siberian craton

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Density heterogeneity of the cratonic lithosphere : a case study of the Siberian craton. / Cherepanova, Yulia; Artemieva, Irina.

I: Gondwana Research, Bind 28, Nr. 4, 2015, s. 1344–1360.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Cherepanova, Y & Artemieva, I 2015, 'Density heterogeneity of the cratonic lithosphere: a case study of the Siberian craton', Gondwana Research, bind 28, nr. 4, s. 1344–1360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2014.10.002

APA

Cherepanova, Y., & Artemieva, I. (2015). Density heterogeneity of the cratonic lithosphere: a case study of the Siberian craton. Gondwana Research, 28(4), 1344–1360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2014.10.002

Vancouver

Cherepanova Y, Artemieva I. Density heterogeneity of the cratonic lithosphere: a case study of the Siberian craton. Gondwana Research. 2015;28(4):1344–1360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2014.10.002

Author

Cherepanova, Yulia ; Artemieva, Irina. / Density heterogeneity of the cratonic lithosphere : a case study of the Siberian craton. I: Gondwana Research. 2015 ; Bind 28, Nr. 4. s. 1344–1360.

Bibtex

@article{92220c77b54d4362a41c87f04e1f15a5,
title = "Density heterogeneity of the cratonic lithosphere: a case study of the Siberian craton",
abstract = "Using free-board modeling, we examine a vertically-averaged mantle density beneath the Archean-Proterozoic Siberian craton in the layer from the Moho down to base of the chemical boundary layer (CBL). Two models are tested: in Model 1 the base of the CBL coincides with the LAB, whereas in Model 2 the base of the CBL is at a 180 km depth. The uncertainty of density model is <0.02 t/m3 or <0.6% with respect to primitive mantle. The results, calculated at in situ and at room temperature (SPT) conditions, indicate a heterogeneous density structure of the Siberian lithospheric mantle with a strong correlation between mantle density variations and the tectonic setting. Three types of cratonic mantle are recognized from mantle density anomalies. 'Pristine' cratonic regions not sampled by kimberlites have the strongest depletion with density deficit of 1.8-3.0% (and SPT density of 3.29-3.33 t/m3 as compared to 3.39 t/m3 of primitive mantle). Cratonic mantle affected by magmatism (including the kimberlite provinces) has a typical density deficit of 1.0-1.5 %, indicative of a metasomatic melt-enrichment. Intracratonic sedimentary basins have a high density mantle (3.38-3.40 t/m3 at SPT) which suggests, at least partial, eclogitization. Moderate density anomalies beneath the Tunguska Basin imply that the source of the Siberian LIP lies outside of the craton. In situ mantle density is used to test the isopycnic condition of the Siberian craton. Both CBL thickness models indicate significant lateral variations in the isopycnic state, correlated with mantle depletion and best achieved for the Anabar Shield region and other intracratonic domains with a strongly depleted mantle. A comparison of synthetic Mg# for the bulk lithospheric mantle calculated from density with Mg# from petrological studies of peridotite xenoliths from the Siberian kimberlites suggests that melt migration may produce local patches of metasomatic material in the overall depleted mantle.",
author = "Yulia Cherepanova and Irina Artemieva",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.gr.2014.10.002",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "1344–1360",
journal = "Gondwana Research",
issn = "1342-937X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Density heterogeneity of the cratonic lithosphere

T2 - a case study of the Siberian craton

AU - Cherepanova, Yulia

AU - Artemieva, Irina

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Using free-board modeling, we examine a vertically-averaged mantle density beneath the Archean-Proterozoic Siberian craton in the layer from the Moho down to base of the chemical boundary layer (CBL). Two models are tested: in Model 1 the base of the CBL coincides with the LAB, whereas in Model 2 the base of the CBL is at a 180 km depth. The uncertainty of density model is <0.02 t/m3 or <0.6% with respect to primitive mantle. The results, calculated at in situ and at room temperature (SPT) conditions, indicate a heterogeneous density structure of the Siberian lithospheric mantle with a strong correlation between mantle density variations and the tectonic setting. Three types of cratonic mantle are recognized from mantle density anomalies. 'Pristine' cratonic regions not sampled by kimberlites have the strongest depletion with density deficit of 1.8-3.0% (and SPT density of 3.29-3.33 t/m3 as compared to 3.39 t/m3 of primitive mantle). Cratonic mantle affected by magmatism (including the kimberlite provinces) has a typical density deficit of 1.0-1.5 %, indicative of a metasomatic melt-enrichment. Intracratonic sedimentary basins have a high density mantle (3.38-3.40 t/m3 at SPT) which suggests, at least partial, eclogitization. Moderate density anomalies beneath the Tunguska Basin imply that the source of the Siberian LIP lies outside of the craton. In situ mantle density is used to test the isopycnic condition of the Siberian craton. Both CBL thickness models indicate significant lateral variations in the isopycnic state, correlated with mantle depletion and best achieved for the Anabar Shield region and other intracratonic domains with a strongly depleted mantle. A comparison of synthetic Mg# for the bulk lithospheric mantle calculated from density with Mg# from petrological studies of peridotite xenoliths from the Siberian kimberlites suggests that melt migration may produce local patches of metasomatic material in the overall depleted mantle.

AB - Using free-board modeling, we examine a vertically-averaged mantle density beneath the Archean-Proterozoic Siberian craton in the layer from the Moho down to base of the chemical boundary layer (CBL). Two models are tested: in Model 1 the base of the CBL coincides with the LAB, whereas in Model 2 the base of the CBL is at a 180 km depth. The uncertainty of density model is <0.02 t/m3 or <0.6% with respect to primitive mantle. The results, calculated at in situ and at room temperature (SPT) conditions, indicate a heterogeneous density structure of the Siberian lithospheric mantle with a strong correlation between mantle density variations and the tectonic setting. Three types of cratonic mantle are recognized from mantle density anomalies. 'Pristine' cratonic regions not sampled by kimberlites have the strongest depletion with density deficit of 1.8-3.0% (and SPT density of 3.29-3.33 t/m3 as compared to 3.39 t/m3 of primitive mantle). Cratonic mantle affected by magmatism (including the kimberlite provinces) has a typical density deficit of 1.0-1.5 %, indicative of a metasomatic melt-enrichment. Intracratonic sedimentary basins have a high density mantle (3.38-3.40 t/m3 at SPT) which suggests, at least partial, eclogitization. Moderate density anomalies beneath the Tunguska Basin imply that the source of the Siberian LIP lies outside of the craton. In situ mantle density is used to test the isopycnic condition of the Siberian craton. Both CBL thickness models indicate significant lateral variations in the isopycnic state, correlated with mantle depletion and best achieved for the Anabar Shield region and other intracratonic domains with a strongly depleted mantle. A comparison of synthetic Mg# for the bulk lithospheric mantle calculated from density with Mg# from petrological studies of peridotite xenoliths from the Siberian kimberlites suggests that melt migration may produce local patches of metasomatic material in the overall depleted mantle.

U2 - 10.1016/j.gr.2014.10.002

DO - 10.1016/j.gr.2014.10.002

M3 - Journal article

VL - 28

SP - 1344

EP - 1360

JO - Gondwana Research

JF - Gondwana Research

SN - 1342-937X

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 129930103