FloodStroem: A fast dynamic GIS-based urban flood and damage model

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

  • Cecilie Thrysøe
  • Balstrøm, Thomas
  • Morten Borup
  • Roland Löwe
  • Behzad Jamali
  • Karsten Arnbjerg-Nielsen

Due to climate change and urbanization, urban flood modelling has become an increasingly important tool in assessing flooding and associated damage costs. However, large computational demands of state-of-the art hydrodynamic flood models makes multiple and real-time simulations unfeasible. This study presents a fast-dynamic GIS-based flood model, FloodStroem. FloodStroem generates a surface network of depressions (bluespots) and flow paths, and routes surcharged water from a subsurface drainage model through the network resulting in flood depth maps and associated damage costs. FloodStroem is tested on three sub-catchments in Elster Creek Catchment, Melbourne, Australia and benchmarked against the 2D distributed hydrodynamic model MIKE 21 and two other simplified models, RUFIDAM and CA-ffé. FloodStroem is robust to the number of bluespots included. For the three sub-catchments, FloodStroem can reproduce flooding time, pattern, depth, and damage costs sufficiently, but has a tendency to underestimate flooding upstream and overestimate flooding downstream. Performance is best for the large, steep sub-catchments and largest rainstorms, where FloodStroem performs better than the two other simplified models. The Critical Success Index (CSI) ranges from 23% for a 5-year storm event in a flat catchment to 65% for a 100-year return period for a steeper catchment. With respect to simulation time, FloodStroem is five orders of magnitude faster than the 2D hydrodynamic model, and 33 times faster when including the entire model setup time, which has potential for further reduction by optimization of the workflow.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer126521
TidsskriftJournal of Hydrology
Vol/bind600
Antal sider12
ISSN0022-1694
DOI
StatusUdgivet - sep. 2021

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
This research has been financially supported by the Australian Government through the Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Realdania through the Smart Cities Water Solutions project under the Klimaspring programme and the Innovation Fund Denmark through the Water Smart Cities project under the Grand Solutions programme (grant no 5157-00009B). Melbourne Water and City of Port Phillip kindly provided the catchment data.

Funding Information:
This research has been financially supported by the Australian Government through the Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Realdania through the Smart Cities Water Solutions project under the Klimaspring programme and the Innovation Fund Denmark through the Water Smart Cities project under the Grand Solutions programme (grant no 5157-00009B). Melbourne Water and City of Port Phillip kindly provided the catchment data.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier B.V.

ID: 275945569