Agrarian modernization through "ideal agricultural subjects": A lost cause for smallholders in Rwanda?

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Agrarian modernization through "ideal agricultural subjects" : A lost cause for smallholders in Rwanda? / Pasgaard, Maya; Kim, Sung Kyu; Dawson, Neil; Fold, Niels.

I: Journal of Political Ecology, Bind 29, Nr. 1, 2022, s. 100-123.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Pasgaard, M, Kim, SK, Dawson, N & Fold, N 2022, 'Agrarian modernization through "ideal agricultural subjects": A lost cause for smallholders in Rwanda?', Journal of Political Ecology, bind 29, nr. 1, s. 100-123. https://doi.org/10.2458/JPE.5012

APA

Pasgaard, M., Kim, S. K., Dawson, N., & Fold, N. (2022). Agrarian modernization through "ideal agricultural subjects": A lost cause for smallholders in Rwanda? Journal of Political Ecology, 29(1), 100-123. https://doi.org/10.2458/JPE.5012

Vancouver

Pasgaard M, Kim SK, Dawson N, Fold N. Agrarian modernization through "ideal agricultural subjects": A lost cause for smallholders in Rwanda? Journal of Political Ecology. 2022;29(1):100-123. https://doi.org/10.2458/JPE.5012

Author

Pasgaard, Maya ; Kim, Sung Kyu ; Dawson, Neil ; Fold, Niels. / Agrarian modernization through "ideal agricultural subjects" : A lost cause for smallholders in Rwanda?. I: Journal of Political Ecology. 2022 ; Bind 29, Nr. 1. s. 100-123.

Bibtex

@article{f1d67eb0ebda41388b0ec62b0ff3430b,
title = "Agrarian modernization through {"}ideal agricultural subjects{"}: A lost cause for smallholders in Rwanda?",
abstract = "Many countries in sub-Saharan Africa have recently gone through agricultural transformations towards increased production of commercial crops, primarily for export, to promote national economic growth. Rural populations are often at the center of such transformations as intended targets of State policies, though their roles in strategies for rural development and poverty alleviation are contested. We approach these changes not as a simple opportunity for accumulation, but rather as an instance of {\textquoteleft}rupture{\textquoteright}, through which opportunities, risks and impacts are experienced differentially by the targeted farmers. With an example from Rwanda, we ask how the State{\textquoteright}s policy strategy and attempts to construct {"}ideal agricultural subjects{"} resonate with the actual changes experienced by farmers themselves. We present three different empirical examples to show that a) when opportunities from agricultural transformation initially arise, only the wealthiest can capture them, and even then the government is seen as the main beneficiary; b) some priority crop growers experience an increase in income and savings due to higher productivity and better prices, while those who do not grow priority crops face land scarcity and lack of employment opportunities; c) requirements to upscale livestock production do not align with the strategies or capacities of many smallholders. We show that only endowed farmers with sufficient land and ability to engage in priority crops or livestock production can take advantage of the opportunities presented by agricultural transformation, while smallholders with constraints to their adoption of promoted changes face vulnerability to dispossession and poverty. We relate these findings to our broader conceptual frame, and encourage further research to explore the integration, modification, resistance to and impacts of idealized policies in Rwanda and across sub-Saharan Africa.",
keywords = "agricultural policy, communaut{\'e}s rurales, comunidades rurales, crop specialization, especializaci{\'o}n de cultivos, Ideal subjects, land tenure, livestock production, politique agricole, pol{\'i}tica agraria, producci{\'o}n ganadera, production animale, rural communities, r{\'e}gime foncier, sp{\'e}cialisation des cultures, sujetos ideales, sujets id{\'e}aux, tenencia de la tierra",
author = "Maya Pasgaard and Kim, {Sung Kyu} and Neil Dawson and Niels Fold",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.2458/JPE.5012",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "100--123",
journal = "Journal of Political Ecology",
issn = "1073-0451",
publisher = "Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Agrarian modernization through "ideal agricultural subjects"

T2 - A lost cause for smallholders in Rwanda?

AU - Pasgaard, Maya

AU - Kim, Sung Kyu

AU - Dawson, Neil

AU - Fold, Niels

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Many countries in sub-Saharan Africa have recently gone through agricultural transformations towards increased production of commercial crops, primarily for export, to promote national economic growth. Rural populations are often at the center of such transformations as intended targets of State policies, though their roles in strategies for rural development and poverty alleviation are contested. We approach these changes not as a simple opportunity for accumulation, but rather as an instance of ‘rupture’, through which opportunities, risks and impacts are experienced differentially by the targeted farmers. With an example from Rwanda, we ask how the State’s policy strategy and attempts to construct "ideal agricultural subjects" resonate with the actual changes experienced by farmers themselves. We present three different empirical examples to show that a) when opportunities from agricultural transformation initially arise, only the wealthiest can capture them, and even then the government is seen as the main beneficiary; b) some priority crop growers experience an increase in income and savings due to higher productivity and better prices, while those who do not grow priority crops face land scarcity and lack of employment opportunities; c) requirements to upscale livestock production do not align with the strategies or capacities of many smallholders. We show that only endowed farmers with sufficient land and ability to engage in priority crops or livestock production can take advantage of the opportunities presented by agricultural transformation, while smallholders with constraints to their adoption of promoted changes face vulnerability to dispossession and poverty. We relate these findings to our broader conceptual frame, and encourage further research to explore the integration, modification, resistance to and impacts of idealized policies in Rwanda and across sub-Saharan Africa.

AB - Many countries in sub-Saharan Africa have recently gone through agricultural transformations towards increased production of commercial crops, primarily for export, to promote national economic growth. Rural populations are often at the center of such transformations as intended targets of State policies, though their roles in strategies for rural development and poverty alleviation are contested. We approach these changes not as a simple opportunity for accumulation, but rather as an instance of ‘rupture’, through which opportunities, risks and impacts are experienced differentially by the targeted farmers. With an example from Rwanda, we ask how the State’s policy strategy and attempts to construct "ideal agricultural subjects" resonate with the actual changes experienced by farmers themselves. We present three different empirical examples to show that a) when opportunities from agricultural transformation initially arise, only the wealthiest can capture them, and even then the government is seen as the main beneficiary; b) some priority crop growers experience an increase in income and savings due to higher productivity and better prices, while those who do not grow priority crops face land scarcity and lack of employment opportunities; c) requirements to upscale livestock production do not align with the strategies or capacities of many smallholders. We show that only endowed farmers with sufficient land and ability to engage in priority crops or livestock production can take advantage of the opportunities presented by agricultural transformation, while smallholders with constraints to their adoption of promoted changes face vulnerability to dispossession and poverty. We relate these findings to our broader conceptual frame, and encourage further research to explore the integration, modification, resistance to and impacts of idealized policies in Rwanda and across sub-Saharan Africa.

KW - agricultural policy

KW - communautés rurales

KW - comunidades rurales

KW - crop specialization

KW - especialización de cultivos

KW - Ideal subjects

KW - land tenure

KW - livestock production

KW - politique agricole

KW - política agraria

KW - producción ganadera

KW - production animale

KW - rural communities

KW - régime foncier

KW - spécialisation des cultures

KW - sujetos ideales

KW - sujets idéaux

KW - tenencia de la tierra

U2 - 10.2458/JPE.5012

DO - 10.2458/JPE.5012

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85129650218

VL - 29

SP - 100

EP - 123

JO - Journal of Political Ecology

JF - Journal of Political Ecology

SN - 1073-0451

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 325372883