Analysing the geography of high-impact entrepreneurship

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Analysing the geography of high-impact entrepreneurship. / Koster, Sierdjan; Kapitsinis, Nikos.

Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Economic Geography. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015. s. 597-613.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Koster, S & Kapitsinis, N 2015, Analysing the geography of high-impact entrepreneurship. i Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Economic Geography. Edward Elgar Publishing, s. 597-613. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857932679.00036

APA

Koster, S., & Kapitsinis, N. (2015). Analysing the geography of high-impact entrepreneurship. I Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Economic Geography (s. 597-613). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857932679.00036

Vancouver

Koster S, Kapitsinis N. Analysing the geography of high-impact entrepreneurship. I Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Economic Geography. Edward Elgar Publishing. 2015. s. 597-613 https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857932679.00036

Author

Koster, Sierdjan ; Kapitsinis, Nikos. / Analysing the geography of high-impact entrepreneurship. Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Economic Geography. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015. s. 597-613

Bibtex

@inbook{4d2a985248ad4166b9acaa1169512a91,
title = "Analysing the geography of high-impact entrepreneurship",
abstract = "Although there are earlier accounts of regional differences in entrepreneurship (see, e.g., Gudgin, 1978), the topic was arguably launched in the early 1990s (see, e.g., Storey and Jones, 1987; Moyes and Westhead, 1990; Fritsch, 1992; Reynolds, 1991; Reynolds et al., 1994). In particular, a 1994 special issue of Regional Studies can be seen as marking the advent of this research theme. This increased interest can partially be explained by the increased availability of regional data (both on the country and on the local levels), enabling systematic comparison between regions. The formation of the research field was, however, undoubtedly also related to the then recent reappraisal of entrepreneurship as one of the key mechanisms in explaining economic development (Reynolds et al., 1994). The recognition of the beneficial economic effects of entrepreneurship raised the question as to which regions displayed relatively high levels of entrepreneurship and which lagged behind.",
author = "Sierdjan Koster and Nikos Kapitsinis",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Charlie Karlsson, Martin Andersson and Therese Norman 2015. All rights reserved.",
year = "2015",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.4337/9780857932679.00036",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780857932662",
pages = "597--613",
booktitle = "Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Economic Geography",
publisher = "Edward Elgar Publishing",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Analysing the geography of high-impact entrepreneurship

AU - Koster, Sierdjan

AU - Kapitsinis, Nikos

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Charlie Karlsson, Martin Andersson and Therese Norman 2015. All rights reserved.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Although there are earlier accounts of regional differences in entrepreneurship (see, e.g., Gudgin, 1978), the topic was arguably launched in the early 1990s (see, e.g., Storey and Jones, 1987; Moyes and Westhead, 1990; Fritsch, 1992; Reynolds, 1991; Reynolds et al., 1994). In particular, a 1994 special issue of Regional Studies can be seen as marking the advent of this research theme. This increased interest can partially be explained by the increased availability of regional data (both on the country and on the local levels), enabling systematic comparison between regions. The formation of the research field was, however, undoubtedly also related to the then recent reappraisal of entrepreneurship as one of the key mechanisms in explaining economic development (Reynolds et al., 1994). The recognition of the beneficial economic effects of entrepreneurship raised the question as to which regions displayed relatively high levels of entrepreneurship and which lagged behind.

AB - Although there are earlier accounts of regional differences in entrepreneurship (see, e.g., Gudgin, 1978), the topic was arguably launched in the early 1990s (see, e.g., Storey and Jones, 1987; Moyes and Westhead, 1990; Fritsch, 1992; Reynolds, 1991; Reynolds et al., 1994). In particular, a 1994 special issue of Regional Studies can be seen as marking the advent of this research theme. This increased interest can partially be explained by the increased availability of regional data (both on the country and on the local levels), enabling systematic comparison between regions. The formation of the research field was, however, undoubtedly also related to the then recent reappraisal of entrepreneurship as one of the key mechanisms in explaining economic development (Reynolds et al., 1994). The recognition of the beneficial economic effects of entrepreneurship raised the question as to which regions displayed relatively high levels of entrepreneurship and which lagged behind.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087967713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4337/9780857932679.00036

DO - 10.4337/9780857932679.00036

M3 - Book chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85087967713

SN - 9780857932662

SP - 597

EP - 613

BT - Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Economic Geography

PB - Edward Elgar Publishing

ER -

ID: 291678632