The Carbon Sink Potential of Southern China After Two Decades of Afforestation

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

  • Fulltext

    Forlagets udgivne version, 4,02 MB, PDF-dokument

Afforestation and land use changes that sequester carbon from the atmosphere in the form of woody biomass have turned southern China into one of the largest carbon sinks globally, which contributes to mitigating climate change. However, forest growth saturation and available land that can be forested limit the longevity of this carbon sink, and while a plethora of studies have quantified vegetation changes over the last decades, the remaining carbon sink potential of this area is currently unknown. Here, we train a model with multiple predictors characterizing the heterogeneous landscapes of southern China and predict the biomass carbon carrying capacity of the region for 2002–2017. We compare observed and predicted biomass carbon density and find that during about two decades of afforestation, 2.34 PgC have been sequestered between 2002 and 2017, and a total of 5.32 Pg carbon can potentially still be sequestrated. This means that the region has reached 73% of its aboveground biomass carbon carrying capacity in 2017, which is 12% more than in 2002, equal to a decrease of 0.77% per year. We identify potential afforestation areas that can still sequester 2.39 PgC, while old and new forests have reached 87% of their potential with 1.85 PgC remaining. Our work locates areas where vegetation has not yet reached its full potential but also shows that afforestation is not a long-term solution for climate change mitigation.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummere2022EF002674
TidsskriftEarth's Future
Vol/bind10
Udgave nummer12
Antal sider13
ISSN2328-4277
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2022

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
This study was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFF1300700, 2018YFD1100103), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41930652, U20A2048); the Marie Curie fellowship (795970), the CAS Interdisciplinary Innovation Team (JCTD‐2021‐16) and the China Scholarship Council (CSC202004910531). M.B. received funding from the DFF Sapere Aude (9064‐00049B) and the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (grant agreement no. 947757 TOFDRY). We thank http://www.naturalearthdata.com for providing background maps.

Funding Information:
This study was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFF1300700, 2018YFD1100103), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41930652, U20A2048); the Marie Curie fellowship (795970), the CAS Interdisciplinary Innovation Team (JCTD-2021-16) and the China Scholarship Council (CSC202004910531). M.B. received funding from the DFF Sapere Aude (9064-00049B) and the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (grant agreement no. 947757 TOFDRY). We thank http://www.naturalearthdata.com for providing background maps.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Earth's Future published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Geophysical Union.

Antal downloads er baseret på statistik fra Google Scholar og www.ku.dk


Ingen data tilgængelig

ID: 340842782