Zimbabwean cotton sector liberalisation: A case of successful private coordination?
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Zimbabwean cotton sector liberalisation : A case of successful private coordination? / Larsen, M. N.
I: CDR Working Paper, Bind 1, Nr. 1, 01.01.2001, s. 1-28.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Zimbabwean cotton sector liberalisation
T2 - A case of successful private coordination?
AU - Larsen, M. N.
PY - 2001/1/1
Y1 - 2001/1/1
N2 - Zimbabwe embarked on market liberalisation in the early 1990s, leading towards increasing participation of private capital in the agricultural sector. This paper examines the emergent shape of a private marketing chain for cotton in Zimbabwe, based on fieldwork conducted between February and July 2000. It outlines the national regulatory system prior to market liberalisation, followed by a description of developments in production, processing and sales of lint against the background of the dismantling of the single-channel marketing system. The privatisation of the cotton marketing board replaced state monopoly with private, although collective private action and coordination prevented downgrading. The paper concludes with a discussion about (absence of) competition and commodity system sustainability in a liberalised market.
AB - Zimbabwe embarked on market liberalisation in the early 1990s, leading towards increasing participation of private capital in the agricultural sector. This paper examines the emergent shape of a private marketing chain for cotton in Zimbabwe, based on fieldwork conducted between February and July 2000. It outlines the national regulatory system prior to market liberalisation, followed by a description of developments in production, processing and sales of lint against the background of the dismantling of the single-channel marketing system. The privatisation of the cotton marketing board replaced state monopoly with private, although collective private action and coordination prevented downgrading. The paper concludes with a discussion about (absence of) competition and commodity system sustainability in a liberalised market.
KW - Agricultural sector
KW - Cotton
KW - Economic liberalization
KW - Industrial crops
KW - Privatization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035055670&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:0035055670
VL - 1
SP - 1
EP - 28
JO - Working Paper - Centre for Development Research, Copenhagen
JF - Working Paper - Centre for Development Research, Copenhagen
SN - 0904-4701
IS - 1
ER -
ID: 236559665