Differentiating between inherited and autocrystic zircon in granitoids

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Differentiating between inherited and autocrystic zircon in granitoids. / Olierook, Hugo K H; Kirkland, Christopher L; Szilas, Kristoffer; Hollis, Julie A; Gardiner, Nicholas J; Steenfelt, Agnete; Jiang, Qiang; Yakymchuk, Chris; Evans, Noreen J; McDonald, Bradley J.

I: Journal of Petrology, Bind 61, Nr. 8, 08.2020.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Olierook, HKH, Kirkland, CL, Szilas, K, Hollis, JA, Gardiner, NJ, Steenfelt, A, Jiang, Q, Yakymchuk, C, Evans, NJ & McDonald, BJ 2020, 'Differentiating between inherited and autocrystic zircon in granitoids', Journal of Petrology, bind 61, nr. 8. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egaa081

APA

Olierook, H. K. H., Kirkland, C. L., Szilas, K., Hollis, J. A., Gardiner, N. J., Steenfelt, A., Jiang, Q., Yakymchuk, C., Evans, N. J., & McDonald, B. J. (2020). Differentiating between inherited and autocrystic zircon in granitoids. Journal of Petrology, 61(8). https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egaa081

Vancouver

Olierook HKH, Kirkland CL, Szilas K, Hollis JA, Gardiner NJ, Steenfelt A o.a. Differentiating between inherited and autocrystic zircon in granitoids. Journal of Petrology. 2020 aug.;61(8). https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egaa081

Author

Olierook, Hugo K H ; Kirkland, Christopher L ; Szilas, Kristoffer ; Hollis, Julie A ; Gardiner, Nicholas J ; Steenfelt, Agnete ; Jiang, Qiang ; Yakymchuk, Chris ; Evans, Noreen J ; McDonald, Bradley J. / Differentiating between inherited and autocrystic zircon in granitoids. I: Journal of Petrology. 2020 ; Bind 61, Nr. 8.

Bibtex

@article{171bd1b8819645e7b28a5878551ac2bf,
title = "Differentiating between inherited and autocrystic zircon in granitoids",
abstract = "Inherited zircon, crystals that did not form in situ from their host magma but were incorporated from either the source region or assimilated from the wall-rock, is common but can be difficult to identify. Age, chemical and/or textural dissimilarity to the youngest zircon fraction are the primary mechanisms of distinguishing such grains. However, in Zr-undersaturated magmas, the entire zircon population may be inherited and, if not identifiable via textural constraints, can lead to erroneous interpretation of magmatic crystallization age and magma source. Here, we present detailed field mapping of cross-cutting relationships, whole-rock geochemistry and zircon textural, U-Pb and trace element data of trondhjemite, granodiorite and granite from two localities in a complex Archean gneiss terrane in southwest Greenland, which reveal cryptic zircon inheritance. Zircon textural, U–Pb and trace element data demonstrate that, in both localities, trondhjemite is the oldest rock (3011 ± 5 Ma, 2σ), which is intruded by granodiorite (2978 ± 4 Ma, 2σ). However, granite intrusions, constrained by cross-cutting relationships as the youngest component, only contain inherited zircon derived from trondhjemite and granodiorite based on ages and trace element concentrations. Without age constraints on the older two lithologies, it would be tempting to consider the youngest zircon fraction as recording crystallization of the granite but this would be erroneous. Furthermore, whole-rock geochemistry indicates that the granite contains only 6 µg g-1 Zr, extremely low for a granitoid with ∼77 wt. %. Such low Zr concentration explains the lack of autocrystic zircon in the granite. We expand on a differentiation tool that uses Th/U ratios in zircon versus that in the whole rock to aid in the identification of inherited zircon. This work emphasizes the need for field observations, geochemistry, grain characterization, and precise geochronology to accurately determine igneous crystallization ages and differentiate between inherited and autocrystic zircon.",
author = "Olierook, {Hugo K H} and Kirkland, {Christopher L} and Kristoffer Szilas and Hollis, {Julie A} and Gardiner, {Nicholas J} and Agnete Steenfelt and Qiang Jiang and Chris Yakymchuk and Evans, {Noreen J} and McDonald, {Bradley J}",
note = "egaa081",
year = "2020",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1093/petrology/egaa081",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
journal = "Journal of Petrology",
issn = "0022-3530",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differentiating between inherited and autocrystic zircon in granitoids

AU - Olierook, Hugo K H

AU - Kirkland, Christopher L

AU - Szilas, Kristoffer

AU - Hollis, Julie A

AU - Gardiner, Nicholas J

AU - Steenfelt, Agnete

AU - Jiang, Qiang

AU - Yakymchuk, Chris

AU - Evans, Noreen J

AU - McDonald, Bradley J

N1 - egaa081

PY - 2020/8

Y1 - 2020/8

N2 - Inherited zircon, crystals that did not form in situ from their host magma but were incorporated from either the source region or assimilated from the wall-rock, is common but can be difficult to identify. Age, chemical and/or textural dissimilarity to the youngest zircon fraction are the primary mechanisms of distinguishing such grains. However, in Zr-undersaturated magmas, the entire zircon population may be inherited and, if not identifiable via textural constraints, can lead to erroneous interpretation of magmatic crystallization age and magma source. Here, we present detailed field mapping of cross-cutting relationships, whole-rock geochemistry and zircon textural, U-Pb and trace element data of trondhjemite, granodiorite and granite from two localities in a complex Archean gneiss terrane in southwest Greenland, which reveal cryptic zircon inheritance. Zircon textural, U–Pb and trace element data demonstrate that, in both localities, trondhjemite is the oldest rock (3011 ± 5 Ma, 2σ), which is intruded by granodiorite (2978 ± 4 Ma, 2σ). However, granite intrusions, constrained by cross-cutting relationships as the youngest component, only contain inherited zircon derived from trondhjemite and granodiorite based on ages and trace element concentrations. Without age constraints on the older two lithologies, it would be tempting to consider the youngest zircon fraction as recording crystallization of the granite but this would be erroneous. Furthermore, whole-rock geochemistry indicates that the granite contains only 6 µg g-1 Zr, extremely low for a granitoid with ∼77 wt. %. Such low Zr concentration explains the lack of autocrystic zircon in the granite. We expand on a differentiation tool that uses Th/U ratios in zircon versus that in the whole rock to aid in the identification of inherited zircon. This work emphasizes the need for field observations, geochemistry, grain characterization, and precise geochronology to accurately determine igneous crystallization ages and differentiate between inherited and autocrystic zircon.

AB - Inherited zircon, crystals that did not form in situ from their host magma but were incorporated from either the source region or assimilated from the wall-rock, is common but can be difficult to identify. Age, chemical and/or textural dissimilarity to the youngest zircon fraction are the primary mechanisms of distinguishing such grains. However, in Zr-undersaturated magmas, the entire zircon population may be inherited and, if not identifiable via textural constraints, can lead to erroneous interpretation of magmatic crystallization age and magma source. Here, we present detailed field mapping of cross-cutting relationships, whole-rock geochemistry and zircon textural, U-Pb and trace element data of trondhjemite, granodiorite and granite from two localities in a complex Archean gneiss terrane in southwest Greenland, which reveal cryptic zircon inheritance. Zircon textural, U–Pb and trace element data demonstrate that, in both localities, trondhjemite is the oldest rock (3011 ± 5 Ma, 2σ), which is intruded by granodiorite (2978 ± 4 Ma, 2σ). However, granite intrusions, constrained by cross-cutting relationships as the youngest component, only contain inherited zircon derived from trondhjemite and granodiorite based on ages and trace element concentrations. Without age constraints on the older two lithologies, it would be tempting to consider the youngest zircon fraction as recording crystallization of the granite but this would be erroneous. Furthermore, whole-rock geochemistry indicates that the granite contains only 6 µg g-1 Zr, extremely low for a granitoid with ∼77 wt. %. Such low Zr concentration explains the lack of autocrystic zircon in the granite. We expand on a differentiation tool that uses Th/U ratios in zircon versus that in the whole rock to aid in the identification of inherited zircon. This work emphasizes the need for field observations, geochemistry, grain characterization, and precise geochronology to accurately determine igneous crystallization ages and differentiate between inherited and autocrystic zircon.

U2 - 10.1093/petrology/egaa081

DO - 10.1093/petrology/egaa081

M3 - Journal article

VL - 61

JO - Journal of Petrology

JF - Journal of Petrology

SN - 0022-3530

IS - 8

ER -

ID: 246668388