Geostatistical simulation of geological architecture and uncertainty propagation in groundwater modeling

Publikation: Bog/antologi/afhandling/rapportPh.d.-afhandlingForskning

Standard

Geostatistical simulation of geological architecture and uncertainty propagation in groundwater modeling. / He, Xiulan.

Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, 2014. 105 s.

Publikation: Bog/antologi/afhandling/rapportPh.d.-afhandlingForskning

Harvard

He, X 2014, Geostatistical simulation of geological architecture and uncertainty propagation in groundwater modeling. Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen. <https://soeg.kb.dk/permalink/45KBDK_KGL/fbp0ps/alma99122493735005763>

APA

He, X. (2014). Geostatistical simulation of geological architecture and uncertainty propagation in groundwater modeling. Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen. https://soeg.kb.dk/permalink/45KBDK_KGL/fbp0ps/alma99122493735005763

Vancouver

He X. Geostatistical simulation of geological architecture and uncertainty propagation in groundwater modeling. Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, 2014. 105 s.

Author

He, Xiulan. / Geostatistical simulation of geological architecture and uncertainty propagation in groundwater modeling. Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, 2014. 105 s.

Bibtex

@phdthesis{f10da22390694791abd19772e709db32,
title = "Geostatistical simulation of geological architecture and uncertainty propagation in groundwater modeling",
abstract = "Groundwater modeling plays an essential role in modern subsurface hydrology research. It{\textquoteright}s generally recognized that simulations and predictions by groundwater models are associated with uncertainties that originate from various sources. The two major uncertainty sources are related to model parameters and model structures, which are the primary focuses of this PhD research. Parameter uncertainty was analyzed using an optimization tool (PEST: Parameter ESTimation) in combination with a random sampling method (LHS: Latin Hypercube Sampling). Model structure, namely geological architecture was analyzed using both a traditional two-point based geostatistical approach and multiple-point geostatistics (MPS). Our results documented that model structure is as important as model parameter regarding groundwater modeling uncertainty. Under certain circumstances the inaccuracy on model structure can be compensated by model parameters, e.g. when hydraulic heads are considered. However, geological structure is the primary source of uncertainty with respect to simulations of groundwater age and capture zone.Operational MPS based software has been on stage for just around ten years; yet, issues regarding training image (TI) and secondary conditioning are currently active research topics. This study examined these two problems by introducing a new data source, SkyTEM (airborne transient electromagnetic), into the implementation of MPS. MPS was applied at three sites in western Denmark; the largely distinct geological structures of these three sites provided appropriate conditions for testing the methods. Our study documented that MPS is an efficient approach for simulating geological heterogeneity, especially for non-stationary system. The high resolution of geophysical data such as SkyTEM is valuable both for developing a training image and for soft conditioning.",
author = "Xiulan He",
note = "Mundtligt forsvar af afhandlingen foregik 3. juli 2014 p{\aa} IGN",
year = "2014",
month = may,
day = "22",
language = "English",
publisher = "Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen",

}

RIS

TY - BOOK

T1 - Geostatistical simulation of geological architecture and uncertainty propagation in groundwater modeling

AU - He, Xiulan

N1 - Mundtligt forsvar af afhandlingen foregik 3. juli 2014 på IGN

PY - 2014/5/22

Y1 - 2014/5/22

N2 - Groundwater modeling plays an essential role in modern subsurface hydrology research. It’s generally recognized that simulations and predictions by groundwater models are associated with uncertainties that originate from various sources. The two major uncertainty sources are related to model parameters and model structures, which are the primary focuses of this PhD research. Parameter uncertainty was analyzed using an optimization tool (PEST: Parameter ESTimation) in combination with a random sampling method (LHS: Latin Hypercube Sampling). Model structure, namely geological architecture was analyzed using both a traditional two-point based geostatistical approach and multiple-point geostatistics (MPS). Our results documented that model structure is as important as model parameter regarding groundwater modeling uncertainty. Under certain circumstances the inaccuracy on model structure can be compensated by model parameters, e.g. when hydraulic heads are considered. However, geological structure is the primary source of uncertainty with respect to simulations of groundwater age and capture zone.Operational MPS based software has been on stage for just around ten years; yet, issues regarding training image (TI) and secondary conditioning are currently active research topics. This study examined these two problems by introducing a new data source, SkyTEM (airborne transient electromagnetic), into the implementation of MPS. MPS was applied at three sites in western Denmark; the largely distinct geological structures of these three sites provided appropriate conditions for testing the methods. Our study documented that MPS is an efficient approach for simulating geological heterogeneity, especially for non-stationary system. The high resolution of geophysical data such as SkyTEM is valuable both for developing a training image and for soft conditioning.

AB - Groundwater modeling plays an essential role in modern subsurface hydrology research. It’s generally recognized that simulations and predictions by groundwater models are associated with uncertainties that originate from various sources. The two major uncertainty sources are related to model parameters and model structures, which are the primary focuses of this PhD research. Parameter uncertainty was analyzed using an optimization tool (PEST: Parameter ESTimation) in combination with a random sampling method (LHS: Latin Hypercube Sampling). Model structure, namely geological architecture was analyzed using both a traditional two-point based geostatistical approach and multiple-point geostatistics (MPS). Our results documented that model structure is as important as model parameter regarding groundwater modeling uncertainty. Under certain circumstances the inaccuracy on model structure can be compensated by model parameters, e.g. when hydraulic heads are considered. However, geological structure is the primary source of uncertainty with respect to simulations of groundwater age and capture zone.Operational MPS based software has been on stage for just around ten years; yet, issues regarding training image (TI) and secondary conditioning are currently active research topics. This study examined these two problems by introducing a new data source, SkyTEM (airborne transient electromagnetic), into the implementation of MPS. MPS was applied at three sites in western Denmark; the largely distinct geological structures of these three sites provided appropriate conditions for testing the methods. Our study documented that MPS is an efficient approach for simulating geological heterogeneity, especially for non-stationary system. The high resolution of geophysical data such as SkyTEM is valuable both for developing a training image and for soft conditioning.

UR - https://soeg.kb.dk/permalink/45KBDK_KGL/fbp0ps/alma99122493735005763

M3 - Ph.D. thesis

BT - Geostatistical simulation of geological architecture and uncertainty propagation in groundwater modeling

PB - Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen

ER -

ID: 118051563