Pocket parks in English and Chinese literature: A review

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Pocket parks in English and Chinese literature : A review. / Zhang, Hanyan; Han, Mingxi.

I: Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, Bind 61, 06.2021.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Zhang, H & Han, M 2021, 'Pocket parks in English and Chinese literature: A review', Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, bind 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127080

APA

Zhang, H., & Han, M. (2021). Pocket parks in English and Chinese literature: A review. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127080

Vancouver

Zhang H, Han M. Pocket parks in English and Chinese literature: A review. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2021 jun;61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127080

Author

Zhang, Hanyan ; Han, Mingxi. / Pocket parks in English and Chinese literature : A review. I: Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2021 ; Bind 61.

Bibtex

@article{5a68667900af485cb0c551553a86552f,
title = "Pocket parks in English and Chinese literature: A review",
abstract = "Pocket parks have the characteristics of being small in size, low in expenditure, easy to access and flexible in shapes and location. Several studies have explored the environmental and social benefits as well as the design principles of pocket parks. However, a meta-analysis of research on pocket park is lacking. There is also no previous comparison of Chinese and English language research papers on pocket parks. This paper aims to systematically review 32 key English publications and 33 key Chinese publications from 4 databases (i.e. Google Scholar, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Data). The results show that the definition of pocket park is only different in size when comparing English and Chinese papers. Moreover, the review highlighted the needs of exploring pocket parks in the areas of Latin America, Africa and Southeast Asia. The summary of research topics and trends provides a useful knowledge for future studies on pocket parks.",
author = "Hanyan Zhang and Mingxi Han",
year = "2021",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127080",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
journal = "Urban Forestry & Urban Greening",
issn = "1618-8667",
publisher = "Elsevier GmbH - Urban und Fischer",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pocket parks in English and Chinese literature

T2 - A review

AU - Zhang, Hanyan

AU - Han, Mingxi

PY - 2021/6

Y1 - 2021/6

N2 - Pocket parks have the characteristics of being small in size, low in expenditure, easy to access and flexible in shapes and location. Several studies have explored the environmental and social benefits as well as the design principles of pocket parks. However, a meta-analysis of research on pocket park is lacking. There is also no previous comparison of Chinese and English language research papers on pocket parks. This paper aims to systematically review 32 key English publications and 33 key Chinese publications from 4 databases (i.e. Google Scholar, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Data). The results show that the definition of pocket park is only different in size when comparing English and Chinese papers. Moreover, the review highlighted the needs of exploring pocket parks in the areas of Latin America, Africa and Southeast Asia. The summary of research topics and trends provides a useful knowledge for future studies on pocket parks.

AB - Pocket parks have the characteristics of being small in size, low in expenditure, easy to access and flexible in shapes and location. Several studies have explored the environmental and social benefits as well as the design principles of pocket parks. However, a meta-analysis of research on pocket park is lacking. There is also no previous comparison of Chinese and English language research papers on pocket parks. This paper aims to systematically review 32 key English publications and 33 key Chinese publications from 4 databases (i.e. Google Scholar, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Data). The results show that the definition of pocket park is only different in size when comparing English and Chinese papers. Moreover, the review highlighted the needs of exploring pocket parks in the areas of Latin America, Africa and Southeast Asia. The summary of research topics and trends provides a useful knowledge for future studies on pocket parks.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127080

DO - 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127080

M3 - Review

VL - 61

JO - Urban Forestry & Urban Greening

JF - Urban Forestry & Urban Greening

SN - 1618-8667

ER -

ID: 260749541